<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=26484"><dc:title>Comparison of the performances of absorption refrigeration cycles</dc:title><dc:creator>Črepinšek,	Zvonimir	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Goričanec,	Darko	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Krope,	Jurij	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>absorption</dc:subject><dc:subject>refrigeration</dc:subject><dc:subject>working fluids</dc:subject><dc:subject>COP</dc:subject><dc:subject>circulation ratio</dc:subject><dc:subject>waste heat</dc:subject><dc:description>This paper compares the performance of absorption refrigeration cycles that are used for refrigeration temperatures below 0°C. Since the most common vapor absorption refrigeration systems use ammonia-water solution with ammonia as the refrigerant and water as the absorbent, research has been devoted to improvement of the performance of ammonia-water absorption refrigeration systems in recent years. In this paper the performances of the ammonia-water and possible alternative cycles as ammonia-lithium nitrate, ammonia-sodium thiocyanate, monomethylamine-water, R22-DMEU, R32-DMEU, R124-DMEU, R152a-DMEU,R125-DMEU, R134a-DMEU, trifluoroethanol (TFE)-tetraethylenglycol dimethylether (TEGDME), methanol-TEGDME and R134a-DMAC are compared in respect of the coefficient of performance (COP) and circulation ratio (f). The highest COP and the lowest f, were found as a function of the generator, condenser, absorber and evaporating temperature.</dc:description><dc:date>2009</dc:date><dc:date>2012-05-31 13:47:57</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>26484</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
