<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=49374"><dc:title>On domination numbers of graph bundles</dc:title><dc:creator>Zmazek,	Blaž	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Žerovnik,	Janez	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>matematika</dc:subject><dc:subject>teorija grafov</dc:subject><dc:subject>kartezični produkt grafov</dc:subject><dc:subject>dominantno število</dc:subject><dc:subject>dominantna množica</dc:subject><dc:subject>grafovski sveženj</dc:subject><dc:subject>mathematics</dc:subject><dc:subject>graph theory</dc:subject><dc:subject>graph bundle</dc:subject><dc:subject>dominating set</dc:subject><dc:subject>domination number</dc:subject><dc:subject>Cartesian product</dc:subject><dc:subject/><dc:description>Let ▫$gamma(G)$▫ be the domination number of a graph ▫$G$▫. It is shown that for any ▫$k ge 0$▫ there exists a Cartesian graph bundle ▫$B Box_varphi F$▫ such that ▫$gamma(B Box_varphi F) = gamma(B)gamma(F) - 2k$▫. The domination numbers of Cartesian bundles of two cycles are determined exactly when the fibre graph is a triangle or a square. A statement similar to Vizing's conjecture on strong graph bundles is shown not to be true by proving the inequality ▫$gamma(B boxtimes_varphi F) le gamma(B)gamma(F)$▫ for strong graph bundles. Examples of graphs ▫$B$▫ and ▫$F$▫ with ▫$gamma(B boxtimes_varphi F) &lt; gamma(B)gamma(F)$▫ are given.</dc:description><dc:date>2005</dc:date><dc:date>2015-07-10 12:00:27</dc:date><dc:type>Delo ni kategorizirano</dc:type><dc:identifier>49374</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
