<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=49833"><dc:title>Societal-level versus individual-level predictions of ethical behavior</dc:title><dc:creator>Ralston,	David A.	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Potočan,	Vojko	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>kultura</dc:subject><dc:subject>vrednote</dc:subject><dc:subject>raziskovanje</dc:subject><dc:subject>poslovna etika</dc:subject><dc:subject>individualizem</dc:subject><dc:subject>kolektivizem</dc:subject><dc:subject>raziskovanje</dc:subject><dc:subject>merjenje</dc:subject><dc:subject/><dc:description>Is the societal-level of analysis sufficient today to understand the values of those in the global workforce? Or are individual-level analyses more appropriate for assessing the influence of values on ethical behaviors across country workforces? Using multi-level analyses for a 48-society sample, we test the utility of both the societal-level and individual-level dimensions of collectivism and individualism values for predicting ethical behaviors of business professionals. Our values-based behavioral analysis indicates that values at the individual-level make a more significant contribution to explaining variance in ethical behaviors than do values at the societal-level. Implicitly, our findings question the soundness of using societal-level values measures. Implications for international business research are discussed.</dc:description><dc:date>2014</dc:date><dc:date>2015-07-10 12:32:05</dc:date><dc:type>Delo ni kategorizirano</dc:type><dc:identifier>49833</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>