<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=51554"><dc:title>An almost complete description of perfect codes in direct products of cycles</dc:title><dc:creator>Klavžar,	Sandi	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Špacapan,	Simon	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Žerovnik,	Janez	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>mathematics</dc:subject><dc:subject>graph theory</dc:subject><dc:subject>error-correcting codes</dc:subject><dc:subject>direct product of graphs</dc:subject><dc:subject>perfect codes</dc:subject><dc:subject>cycles</dc:subject><dc:description>Let ▫$G = times_{i=1}^nC_{ell_i}$▫ be a direct product of cycles. It is proved that for any ▫$r ge 1$▫, and any ▫$n ge 2$▫, each connected component of ▫$G$▫ contains an ▫$r$▫-perfect code provided that each ▫$ell_i$▫ is a multiple of ▫$r^n + (r+1)^n▫$. On the other hand, if a code of ▫$G$▫ contains a given vertex and its canonical local vertices, then any ▫$ell_i$▫ is a multiple of ▫$r^n + (r+1)^n$▫. It is also proved that an ▫$r$▫-perfect code ▫$(r ge 2)$▫ of ▫$G$▫ is uniquely determined by ▫$n$▫ vertices, and it is conjectured that for ▫$r ge 2$▫ no other codes in ▫$G$▫ exist other than the constructed ones.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher><dc:date>2006</dc:date><dc:date>2015-07-10 14:54:37</dc:date><dc:type>Znanstveno delo</dc:type><dc:identifier>51554</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
