<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=59255"><dc:title>Identification of auditor´s report qualifications</dc:title><dc:creator>Zdolšek,	Daniel	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Jagrič,	Timotej	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Odar,	Marjan	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>auditing</dc:subject><dc:subject>auditor’s report</dc:subject><dc:subject>qualified report</dc:subject><dc:subject>identification audit model</dc:subject><dc:subject>Slovenia</dc:subject><dc:description>An auditor´s report qualifies a company´s financial statements if the management´s representation of the company´s financial affairs is not in accordance with nationally generally accepted accounting pronouncements. The present research studies the qualification of auditors´ reports in relation to the circumstances in the company´s economic situation that lead to the qualification. Qualifications have been analysed on a sample of 293 large Slovenian companies. The results reveal that companies with qualified auditors´ reports have high indebtedness, low liquidity, low efficiency and poor profitability in comparison with companies with unqualified auditors´ reports. From a statistical viewpoint, a logistic model can distinguish between companies that received a qualified auditor´s report and companies that received an unqualified auditor´s report on a sample of Slovenian large companies.</dc:description><dc:date>2015</dc:date><dc:date>2016-05-11 03:50:14</dc:date><dc:type>Delo ni kategorizirano</dc:type><dc:identifier>59255</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
