<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=65662"><dc:title>Attitudes towards Euro-English in a European Union institution</dc:title><dc:creator>Balič,	Tina	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>European Union institution</dc:subject><dc:subject>Euro-English</dc:subject><dc:subject>corpus linguistics</dc:subject><dc:subject>deviations from Standard English</dc:subject><dc:subject>attitudes towards language</dc:subject><dc:subject>Eurojargon</dc:subject><dc:description>This study deals with the attitudinal aspect of Euro-English, denoting a specific form of the English language that is frequently used within the institutions of the European Union. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 285 representatives who work for one of these institutions in Brussels. The respondents were asked to rate several deviations from Standard English, identified in a corpus-based analysis of EU texts, as either "acceptable" or "unacceptable" English usage. The findings reveal that the high acceptability rates of the proposed features among the non-native English-speaking respondents were mainly related to their proficiency in English and/or mother tongue interference. Moreover, since native speakers of English also accepted most of the proposed deviations, it follows that the participants did not seem to be aware of non-standardness in the test sentences. Euro-English must be regarded as EU jargon due to its technical, administrative or legal nature and not as a separate non-standard form of English for EU institutional settings.</dc:description><dc:date>2016</dc:date><dc:date>2017-05-12 14:14:17</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>65662</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
