<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=66511"><dc:title>Combination of lung ultrasound (a comet-tail sign) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in differentiating acute heart failure from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma as cause of acute dyspnea in prehospital emergency setting</dc:title><dc:creator>Prosen,	Gregor	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Klemen,	Petra	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Strnad,	Matej	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Grmec,	Štefek	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>lungs</dc:subject><dc:subject>ultrasound</dc:subject><dc:subject>N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide</dc:subject><dc:subject>acute heart failure</dc:subject><dc:subject>chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</dc:subject><dc:subject>asthma</dc:subject><dc:subject>acute dyspnea</dc:subject><dc:description>Introduction: We studied the diagnostic accuracy of bedside lung ultrasound (the presence of a comet tail sign), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and clinical assessment (modified Boston criteria) in differentiating heart failure (HF)- related acute dyspnea from pulmonary (COPD/asthma) related acute dyspnea in the prehospital setting.

Methods: Prospective study was performed at the Center for Emergency Medicine Maribor, Slovenia, between July 2007 and April 2010. Two groups of patients were compared: HF-related acute dyspnea group (n = 129) vs pulmonary-related (asthma/COPD) acute dyspnea group (n = 89). All patients underwent lung ultrasound examination, along with basic laboratory, rapid NT-proBNP testing and chest X-ray.

Results: Ultrasound comet tail sign has 100% sensitivity, 95% specificity, 100% negative predictive value (NPV) and 96% positive predictive value (PPV) for the diagnosis of HF. NT-proBNP (cut-off point 1000 pg/ml) has 92% sensitivity, 89% specificity, 86% NPV and 90% PPV. Boston modified criteria have 85% sensitivity, 86% specificity, 80% NPV and 90% PPV. Comparing the three methods, we found significant differences between ultrasound sign vs NT-proBNP (P&lt;0.05) and Boston modified criteria (P&lt;0.05). Combination of ultrasound sign and NT-proBNP has 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% NPV and 100% PPV. With ultrasound we can exclude HF in patients with pulmonary related dyspnea who have positive NT-proBNP (&gt; 1000 pg/ml) and previous history of HF.

Conclusions: Ultrasound comet tail sign alone or in combination with NT-proBNP has a high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between acute HF and COPD/asthma causes of acute dyspnea in prehospital emergency setting.</dc:description><dc:date>2011</dc:date><dc:date>2017-06-29 09:40:32</dc:date><dc:type>Znanstveno delo</dc:type><dc:identifier>66511</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
