<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=70859"><dc:title>A fundamental study of the performance of X-section cast-in-place concrete single piles</dc:title><dc:creator>Wang,	Yu	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lv,	Yaru	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Zhang,	Dongdong	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Zhou,	Jieying	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>,	Fakulteta za gradbeništvo, prometno inženirstvo in arhitekturo Univerze v Mariboru	(Lastnik avtorskih pravic)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>X-section cast-in-place concrete pile</dc:subject><dc:subject>field static load test</dc:subject><dc:subject>three-dimensional numerical back-analysis</dc:subject><dc:subject>stresstransfer mechanism</dc:subject><dc:subject>side resistance</dc:subject><dc:subject>soil arching</dc:subject><dc:description>X-section cast-in-place concrete (XCC) piles are used because they have a higher bearing capacity than circularsection cast-in-place concrete (CCC) piles of the same cross-sectional area. Although the bearing capacity of XCC piles has been studied, the performance of XCC single piles, especially for the stress-transfer mechanism dependent on the geometrical effects, is still not fully understood. This paper reports two comparative field static load tests on an XCC and a CCC single pile of the same cross-sectional area. In addition, corresponding threedimensional numerical back-analyses are performed to provide a fundamental understanding. The measured and computed results reveal that the XCC single pile has an approximately 25% higher ultimate bearing capacity than the CCC single pile. This is because the XCC single pile has an approximately 20% larger total side resistance, which is caused by a 60% larger pile perimeter and a slightly smaller unit side resistance. Lateral soil arching effects are developed, causing a non-uniform effective normal stress and a shear stress across the circumference of the XCC single pile. It is suggested that XCC single piles have a higher efficiency in terms of material saving compared with CCC single piles.</dc:description><dc:date>2016</dc:date><dc:date>2018-06-15 14:52:30</dc:date><dc:type>Znanstveno delo</dc:type><dc:identifier>70859</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:rights>Fakulteta za gradbeništvo, prometno inženirstvo in arhitekturo Univerze v Mariboru</dc:rights></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
