<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=85027"><dc:title>Synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles with covalently bonded polyacrylic acid for use as forward osmosis draw agents</dc:title><dc:creator>Ban,	Irena	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Drofenik,	Mihael	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bukšek,	Hermina	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Petrinić,	Irena	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hélix-Nielsen,	Claus	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Vohl,	Sabina	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gyergyek,	Sašo	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Stergar,	Janja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>magnetic nanoparticle</dc:subject><dc:subject>forward osmosis</dc:subject><dc:subject>draw solution</dc:subject><dc:subject>osmose</dc:subject><dc:description>Multicoated magnetite (Fe3O4) magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) with polyacrylic acid (PAA) as a terminal hydrophilic ligand were synthesized and examined for use as a draw solution (DS) agent in forward osmosis (FO). After coating superparamagnetic iron-oxide MNPs with (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES) the carboxyl groups of PAA were bound to APTES amino groups via the crosslinker 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide (EDC) forming a peptide bond resulting in stable water-soluble particles (MNP@APTES@PAA) with a concentration-normalised osmotic pressure of 1.56 bar L g−1. The MNP@APTES@PAA solution was evaluated as a DS in two FO filtrations with deionized (DI) water as a feed solution (FS): one using freshly prepared MNP@APTES@PAA and one using magnetically recovered (re-concentrated) MNP@APTES@PAA. The resulting MNP@APTES@PAA nanocomposites exhibit good colloidal stability in aqueous solution with a concentration-normalized osmotic pressure of 1.56 bar L g−1. This is 12-fold higher than that in our previous studies of poly-sodium-acrylate coated MNPs and 3-fold higher than that of citric acid coated MNPs. The water recoveries of the two filtrations were 25.7% and 13.6%, respectively, after 2 h of FO filtration time resulting in a DS osmotic pressure of 2.5 bar with a concentration of 4.3 g L−1 and a DS osmotic pressure of 2.6 with a concentration of 3.7 g L−1 respectively.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Royal Society of Chemistry</dc:publisher><dc:date>2023</dc:date><dc:date>2023-08-16 13:26:05</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>85027</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
