<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=87522"><dc:title>Curiosity, checking, and knowing</dc:title><dc:creator>Miščević,	Nenad	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>checking inquiry</dc:subject><dc:subject>curiosity</dc:subject><dc:subject>virtue epistemology</dc:subject><dc:description>In his important and original book, Knowing and Checking, Guido Melchior provides advice on how to tackle skepticism. I argue that his analysis points to a possible virtue-theoretic answer to skepticism, which I call the restraint solution, i.e., activate your self-trust and restrain your inquisitiveness! It leads one to the ideal of bounded reflective curiosity: when it comes to knowledge, we should restrain our second-order, reflective curiosity and stay content with the somewhat Moorean trust in ordinary everyday beliefs. We can preserve our ordinary, first-order vigilance and investigative interest (curiosity) without falling into skeptical over-caution which is basically a reflective, second-order vicious attitude.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Springer Nature</dc:publisher><dc:date>2023</dc:date><dc:date>2024-03-19 15:08:31</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>87522</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
