<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=88179"><dc:title>Predictive power of biology teacher's self-efficacy on acceptability and application of virtual and hands-on dissections</dc:title><dc:creator>Havlíčková,	Veronika	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Šorgo,	Andrej	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bilék,	Martin	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>biology lessons</dc:subject><dc:subject>biology teachers</dc:subject><dc:subject>hands-on dissection</dc:subject><dc:subject>teacher self-efficacy</dc:subject><dc:subject>virtual dissection</dc:subject><dc:description>Hands-on dissections of animals are traditionally regarded as an essential part of biology education. Nowadays, regardless of the reported educational benefits, there is a gradual change in the concept and acceptance of hands-on dissection, leading in many cases to its abandonment in schools and its replacement with alternatives such as 3D models, figurines, plastination and computer-based alternatives. However, the position of hands-on dissection has recently been challenged, mostly by computer-supported alternatives. The aim of the study was to explore whether teacher self-efficacy can be recognized as a predictor of the application of the different kinds of animals in hands-on and virtual dissections in Biology lessons. Based on responses from 405 Czech Biology teachers there are differences in the acceptability and implementation of organisms for hands-on and virtual dissection. It was established, that self-efficacy is not a predictor of either the acceptability of organisms or actual behaviour in both variants of dissection.</dc:description><dc:publisher> Scientific Methodical Center </dc:publisher><dc:date>2023</dc:date><dc:date>2024-04-11 03:49:19</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>88179</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
