<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=89886"><dc:title>European* clinical practice recommendations on opioids for chronic noncancer pain - Part 1</dc:title><dc:creator>Hauser,	Winfried	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Morlion,	Bart	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Vowles,	Kevin E.	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bannister,	Kirsty	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Buchser,	Eric	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Casale,	Roberto	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Chenot,	Jean-François	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Chumbley,	Gillian	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Drewes,	Asbjørn M.	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Dom,	Gert	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Jutila,	Liisa	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>O'Brien,	Tony	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pogatzky-Zahn,	Esther	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Rakuša,	Martin	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Suarez-Serrano,	Carmen	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Tölle,	Thomas	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Krčevski-Škvarč,	Nevenka	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>pain</dc:subject><dc:subject>cronic disease</dc:subject><dc:subject>analgesia</dc:subject><dc:subject>opioid analgesics</dc:subject><dc:description>Background: Opioid use for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is complex. In the absence of pan-European guidance on this issue, a position paper was commissioned by the European Pain Federation (EFIC).
Methods: The clinical practice recommendations were developed by eight scientific societies and one patient self-help organization under the coordination of EFIC. A systematic literature search in MEDLINE (up until January 2020) was performed. Two categories of guidance are given: Evidence-based recommendations (supported by evidence from systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials or of observational studies) and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) statements (supported either by indirect evidence or by case-series, case-control studies and clinical experience). The GRADE system was applied to move from evidence to recommendations. The recommendations and GCP statements were developed by a multiprofessional task force (including nursing, service users, physicians, physiotherapy and psychology) and formal multistep procedures to reach a set of consensus recommendations. The clinical practice recommendations were reviewed by five external reviewers from North America and Europe and were also posted for public comment.
Results: The key clinical practice recommendations suggest: (a) first optimizing established non-pharmacological treatments and non-opioid analgesics and (b) considering opioid treatment if established non-pharmacological treatments or non-opioid analgesics are not effective and/or not tolerated and/or contraindicated. Evidence- and clinical consensus-based potential indications and contraindications for opioid treatment are presented. Eighteen GCP recommendations give guidance regarding clinical evaluation, as well as opioid treatment assessment, monitoring, continuation and discontinuation.
Conclusions: Opioids remain a treatment option for some selected patients with CNCP under careful surveillance.
Significance: In chronic pain, opioids are neither a universal cure nor a universally dangerous weapon. They should only be used for some selected chronic noncancer pain syndromes if established non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment options have failed in supervised pain patients as part of a comprehensive, multi-modal, multi-disciplinary approach to treatment. In this context alone, opioid therapy can be a useful tool in achieving and maintaining an optimal level of pain control in some patients.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Wiley</dc:publisher><dc:date>2021</dc:date><dc:date>2024-08-16 10:11:03</dc:date><dc:type>Znanstveno delo</dc:type><dc:identifier>89886</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
