<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=91050"><dc:title>On the insufficiencies of the current legislative regime regarding physician-patient mediation in the professional liability of physicians. A critical analysis of the Polish solution</dc:title><dc:creator>Bek,	Dominika	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hanc,	Jakub	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>mediation</dc:subject><dc:subject>professional liability</dc:subject><dc:subject>medical chamber</dc:subject><dc:subject>physician</dc:subject><dc:subject>restorative justice</dc:subject><dc:description>The article presents a critical opinion on physician-patient mediation conducted in the context of proceedings on the professional liability of physicians. The starting point is the Act on Medical Chambers, which provides for the possibility of conducting a mediation between the accused physician and the aggrieved patient. This regulation is unique in the region. Its specific measures, such as, for example, the choice of a mediator among physicians, have undergone a critical assessment in the literature. As a rule, the need for the functioning of mediation in the context of professional liability is not called into question. However, a thorough analysis of the assumptions of mediation and restorative justice and the function of professional liability of physicians suggests going a step further. Although the physician-patient conflict certainly requires conciliatory solutions, it seems that the disciplinary regime does not provide an adequate foundation for agreement because it is unable to secure the aggrieved person’s interests.</dc:description><dc:date>2023</dc:date><dc:date>2024-10-16 23:19:39</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>91050</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
