<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=96944"><dc:title>Chinese phrasal downgraders: a problem for L2 Learners?</dc:title><dc:creator>Kádár,	Dániel Z.	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>House,	Juliane	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Chai,	Yilin	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>applied linguistics</dc:subject><dc:subject>Chinese</dc:subject><dc:subject>English</dc:subject><dc:subject>phrasal downgraders</dc:subject><dc:subject>speech acts</dc:subject><dc:description>In this study we investigate why phrasal downgraders such as mei-guanxi 没关系 (‘does not matter’) and meishi(-meishi) 没事 (没事) (‘no problem(-no problem)’) turn out to be problematic even for advanced L2 learners of Chinese. Although both mei-guanxi and meishi(-meishi) are standardly mentioned in Chinese L2 textbooks, various of their uses are still surprisingly irritating for L2 learners. We look at the heart of such irritations by following a tripartite bottom-up analytic procedure: We first conducted semi-structured interviews with advanced L2 learners of Chinese who reported having been irritated by the phrasal downgraders under investigation. We then examined uses of these expressions in a Chinese corpus, and finally we interpreted our learners’ L2 irritations through the outcomes of our corpus analysis. We examined our data through a minimalist and finite typology of speech acts and a related interactional system. Our interviewees made altogether five observation types, which we were able to systematically explain with the aid of our approach.</dc:description><dc:publisher>de Gruyter Mouton</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-02-05 03:11:57</dc:date><dc:type>Znanstveno delo</dc:type><dc:identifier>96944</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
