<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=98499"><dc:title>OPTIFARM: Benchmarking YOLO architectures for location-robust potato quality detection</dc:title><dc:creator>Peršak,	Tadej	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Simonič,	Marko	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hernavs,	Jernej	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ficko,	Mirko	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Klančnik,	Simon	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>potato sorting</dc:subject><dc:subject>object detection</dc:subject><dc:subject>YOLO</dc:subject><dc:subject>cross-location generalization</dc:subject><dc:subject>food quality and safety</dc:subject><dc:subject>intelligent inspection</dc:subject><dc:subject>non-destructive testing</dc:subject><dc:description>Potato sorting in post-harvest processing relies heavily on manual visual inspection, which is physically demanding, subjective, and insufficiently scalable for modern packing lines. This study investigates the feasibility of a low-cost RGB-based optical inspection system for automated potato quality detection using deep learning-based object detection. A controlled imaging platform was constructed using commodity hardware, and a dataset of 19,805 manually annotated instances across 1361 images was collected from two geographically distinct farm locations in Slovenia. A systematic benchmark of 25 model configurations spanning five YOLO architecture families—YOLOv8, YOLOv9, YOLOv10, YOLOv11, and YOLO26—was conducted across three practical quality classes (Edible, Feed, Rotten) using a strict cross-location evaluation protocol in which models were trained on one location and tested on a completely unseen second location. All models achieved strong in-distribution performance (F1 ≥ 0.906), but showed considerable variation under cross-location conditions, with external F1 ranging from 0.792 to 0.918. The yolo26_l configuration achieved the best cross-location performance (F1 = 0.918, mAP@0.5:0.95 = 0.816, ΔF1 = 0.029), demonstrating that transferable representations are achievable under a standard supervised training protocol. Per-class analysis identified feed detection as the primary generalization bottleneck. The results confirm that affordable RGB-based sorting systems are technically feasible and highlight cross-location evaluation as an essential protocol for assessing real-world deployment readiness.</dc:description><dc:publisher>MDPI</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-06-17 10:17:13</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>98499</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
