<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>A comparison of BPMN notation and natural language understandability</dc:title><dc:creator>Huber,	Jernej	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Živkovič,	Aleš	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Heričko,	Marjan	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>business processes</dc:subject><dc:subject>BPMN diagrams</dc:subject><dc:subject>natural language</dc:subject><dc:description>In this paper, we explored the understandability of BPMN notation as compared with the understandability of natural language. We conducted an experiment in which we examined the results of students who were completing two different types of questionnaires. Students from the first group analyzed BPMN diagrams, while others analyzed an unstructured text. The text and BPMN diagrams were from identical problem domains and both groups of students answered the same questions. We compared the results and conducted a statistical analysis using a t-test with independent samples. Because we were able to classify students according to their prior knowledge of BPMN notation, we also conducted a one-way ANOVA test and performed a detailed analysis of the collected data.</dc:description><dc:date>2011</dc:date><dc:date>2012-06-01 08:35:12</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>26895</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 004.93</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 15505942</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>NUK URN: URN:SI:UM:DK:C1MV2I4Z</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
