<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Enriching the higher education grading procedure with a computer generated feedback</dc:title><dc:creator>Šuen,	Tomaž	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Turkanović,	Muhamed	(Mentor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>feedback</dc:subject><dc:subject>exam</dc:subject><dc:subject>grading</dc:subject><dc:subject>computer generated</dc:subject><dc:description>Assignments in the educational process take many forms, e.g. homework, laboratory projects, written exams. The feedback students receive is mostly in the form of a grade, or percentage, without any further explanation. Meanwhile, the higher education teachers see that their students are making the same mistakes year after year. Therefore, we gathered those common mistakes in a structured way and created the Examco application, which grades students based on their mistakes and generates a written report for the students, explaining what they have done wrong and how to improve. In the experiment we evaluated the exam using the Examco application and generated feedback for students. The students later evaluated the provided feedback through a survey. With the structured interview made with higher education teachers, we learned about their grading methods and thoughts on the grading method put forward by our research.</dc:description><dc:publisher>[T. Šuen]</dc:publisher><dc:date>2018</dc:date><dc:date>2018-09-27 11:10:04</dc:date><dc:type>Magistrsko delo/naloga</dc:type><dc:identifier>72477</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: [004.777:004.62]:37.091.26(043.2)</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 21874710</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>NUK URN: URN:SI:UM:DK:PDGGZFI7</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
