<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Private security regulation in Hungary and Slovenia - a comparative study based on legislation and societal foundations</dc:title><dc:creator>Sotlar,	Andrej	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Christián,	László	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:description>Purpose: The  purpose  of  the  article  is  to  conduct  a  comparative  study  of  private  security regulation in Hungary and Slovenia using Button-Stiernstedt’s evaluation model based on legislation and societal foundations and to find out where the two countries are in comparison with other EU member states. Design/Methods/Approach: First,  the  main  characteristics  of  private  security  in  Hungary  and  Slovenia  are analysed and presented through a literature and legislation review. Second, Button-Stiernstedt’s  evaluation  model  using  legislation  and  societal  criteria  is studied  and  explained.  Third,  this  evaluation  model  is  used  to  evaluate  private  security in both countries and, fourth, Hungarian and Slovenian private security regulations are ranked on a regulatory system scale of 27 EU member states.Findings: In this re-evaluation, Slovenian private security regulation received 94 points which makes it equal to Belgium that holds first place among 27 EU countries. Hungary received 74 points, ranking it seventh with the same number of points as  Ireland.  Although  Hungary  seems  to  score  relatively  highly  in  the  survey,  this  does  not  mean  the  situation  in  practice  is  positive.  Button-Stiernstedt’s private  security  regulation  evaluation  model  is  mostly  useful  for  international  comparisons. However, we suggest that in the future some criteria be used more flexibly than the authors proposed in 2016. Research Limitations: Limitations of the researcharise from the fact that the presented evaluation model  of  private  security  regulation  is  not  yet  fully  developed  and  that  not  all  data on private security in both countries were available. Practical Implications: The  findings  are  useful  for  both  further  harmonising  private  security regulation within the EU and improving the presented evaluation model to make international comparisons more precise. VARSTVOSLOVJE,Journal of CriminalJustice and Security,year 20no. 2pp. 143‒162
144Originality/Value: Hungarian private security regulation is evaluated for the first time using Button-Stiernstedt’s evaluation model.</dc:description><dc:date>2018</dc:date><dc:date>2020-04-16 07:51:14</dc:date><dc:type>Znanstveno delo</dc:type><dc:identifier>76093</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 351.746.2(439)(497.4)</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>OceCobissID: 99492352</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 3581418</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 1580-0253</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>NUK URN: URN:SI:UM:DK:WQWOS0UX</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
