<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Process evaluation of the scale-up of integrated diabetes and hypertension care in Belgium, Cambodia and Slovenia (the SCUBY Project)</dc:title><dc:creator>Martens,	Monika	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Wouters,	Edwin	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Van Olmen,	Josefien	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Klemenc-Ketiš,	Zalika	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Chhim,	Srean	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Chham,	Savina	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Buffel,	Verle	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Danhieux,	Katrien	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Stojnić,	Nataša	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Zavrnik,	Črt	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Poplas-Susič,	Tonka	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Van Damme,	Win	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ir,	Por	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Remmen,	Roy	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ku,	Grace Marie V	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Klipstein-Grobusch,	Kerstin	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Boateng,	Daniel	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>diabetes and hypertension care</dc:subject><dc:subject>Belgium</dc:subject><dc:subject>Cambodia</dc:subject><dc:subject>Slovenia</dc:subject><dc:description>Introduction Integrated care interventions for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension (HT) are effective, yet challenges exist with regard to their implementation and scale-up. The ‘SCale-Up diaBetes and hYpertension care’ (SCUBY) Project aims to facilitate the scale-up of integrated care for T2D and HT through the co-creation and implementation of contextualised scale-up roadmaps in Belgium, Cambodia and Slovenia. We hereby describe the plan for the process and scale-up evaluation of the SCUBY Project. The specific goals of the process and scale-up evaluation are to (1) analyse how, and to what extent, the roadmap has been implemented, (2) assess how the differing contexts can influence the implementation process of the scale-up strategies and (3) assess the progress of the scale-up. 
Methods and analysis A comprehensive framework was developed to include process and scale-up evaluation embedded in implementation science theory. Key implementation outcomes include acceptability, feasibility, relevance, adaptation, adoption and cost of roadmap activities. A diverse range of predominantly qualitative tools—including a policy dialogue reporting form, a stakeholder follow-up interview and survey, project diaries and policy mapping—were developed to assess how stakeholders perceive the scale-up implementation process and adaptations to the roadmap. The role of context is considered relevant, and barriers and facilitators to scale-up will be continuously assessed. 
Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been obtained from the Institutional Review Board (ref. 1323/19) at the Institute of Tropical Medicine (Antwerp, Belgium). The SCUBY Project presents a comprehensive framework to guide the process and scale-up evaluation of complex interventions in different health systems. We describe how implementation outcomes, mechanisms of impact and scale-up outcomes can be a basis to monitor adaptations through a co-creation process and to guide other scale-up interventions making use of knowledge translation and co-creation activities.</dc:description><dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing</dc:publisher><dc:date>2022</dc:date><dc:date>2024-06-27 07:52:02</dc:date><dc:type>Znanstveno delo</dc:type><dc:identifier>89222</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 616.379:616.1-084</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 136711427</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062151</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 2044-6055</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
