<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Hemodynamic response to high- and low-load resistance exercise in patients with coronary artery disease</dc:title><dc:creator>Kambič,	Tim	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hadžić,	Vedran	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lainščak,	Mitja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>sport</dc:subject><dc:subject>cardiac rehabilitation</dc:subject><dc:subject>resistance training</dc:subject><dc:subject>blood pressure</dc:subject><dc:subject>heart rate</dc:subject><dc:description>Low-load resistance exercise (LL-RE) is recommended as an adjunct therapy to aerobic exercise during cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary artery disease. The safety and hemodynamic response to high-load (HL) RE remain unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic response during both HL-RE and LL-RE prior to cardiac rehabilitation. Forty-three patients with coronary artery disease and/or percutaneous coronary intervention performed three sets of leg-press exercise using HL-RE (eight repetitions at the intensity of 80% of one repetition maximum (1-RM)) and LL-RE (16 repetitions at the intensity of 40% 1-RM) in a randomized crossover sequence. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and rating of perceived exertion were measured at baseline, after each set of RE and post-exercise. No clinically relevant changes in HR and BP or in patient-reported symptoms were recorded during HL-RE or LL-RE. Compared with baseline, HR and SBP increased during LL-RE (from 66 bpm to 86 bpm, time effect: p &lt; 0.001; from 129 mmHg to 146 mmHg, time effect: p &lt; 0.001) and HL-RE (from 68 bpm to 86 bpm, time effect: p &lt; 0.001; from 130 mmHg to 146 mmHg, time effect: p &lt; 0.001). Compared with HL-RE, the increase in HR was greater after the final set of LL-RE (32% vs. 28%, p = 0.015), without significant differences in SBP and DBP between LL-RE and HL-RE. Rating of perceived exertion was higher after the 1st set of HL-RE compared with LL-RE (median (interquartile range): 6 (5–7) vs. 6 (5–6), p = 0.010). In patients with coronary artery disease, both HL-RE and LL-RE were safe and well-tolerated. Hemodynamic changes were similar and within the physiological response to RE.</dc:description><dc:publisher>MDPI</dc:publisher><dc:date>2021</dc:date><dc:date>2024-08-20 14:14:06</dc:date><dc:type>Znanstveno delo</dc:type><dc:identifier>89985</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 616.1:796.01</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 59012611</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18083905</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 1660-4601</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
