<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Full-scale test and load-bearing capacity evaluation of synthetic-polymer-fiber-reinforced concrete tetrapods under quasi-static loading</dc:title><dc:creator>Unuk,	Žiga	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kuhta,	Milan	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>tetrapods</dc:subject><dc:subject>concrete</dc:subject><dc:subject>synthetic-polymer fibers</dc:subject><dc:subject>load tests</dc:subject><dc:subject>load-bearing capacity</dc:subject><dc:subject>residual load-bearing capacity</dc:subject><dc:subject>load displacement</dc:subject><dc:subject>calculation</dc:subject><dc:description>This paper studies the load-bearing capacity of various concrete tetrapods under quasistatic loading. The tetrapods were made of plain concrete and synthetic-polymer-fiber-reinforced
concrete. Load tests of the tetrapods were performed. The maximum load-bearing capacity and
the residual-load-bearing capacity of the tetrapods (the load-bearing capacity after the first crack
or at different crack widths) were evaluated. The strength and residual-strength values were backcalculated from the load-bearing capacities, and compared with available data from the literature.
The specimens with and without fibers achieved similar maximum load-bearing capacities, with
cracks occurring at identical locations. However, the differences in residual-load-bearing capacity
were more significant. The synthetic-polymer-fiber-reinforced concrete tetrapods exhibited relatively
high residual-load-bearing capacities, even at higher displacements and crack widths. Two different
calculation-procedures were used for the load-bearing-capacity evaluation. A load-displacement
calculation based on the moment-versus-curvature relation and the plastic-hinge approach was
performed, and additionally proved the applicability of the employed calculation-procedures for the
concrete tetrapod load-bearing-capacity evaluation.</dc:description><dc:publisher>MDPI</dc:publisher><dc:date>2022</dc:date><dc:date>2025-03-12 08:04:34</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>92026</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 691:625.843</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 133529091</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.3390/buildings12122143</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 2075-5309</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:rights>© 2022 by the authors</dc:rights></metadata>
