<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>Multiparametric ▫$Cost–CO_2$▫ optimization of bored reinforced-concrete piles under combined loading in cohesive soils</dc:title><dc:creator>Jelušič,	Primož	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>laterally loaded pile</dc:subject><dc:subject>reinforced-concrete piles</dc:subject><dc:subject>structural analysis</dc:subject><dc:subject>reinforced-concrete design</dc:subject><dc:subject>optimization</dc:subject><dc:subject>CO2 emissions</dc:subject><dc:subject>genetic algorithm</dc:subject><dc:subject>multiparametric analysis</dc:subject><dc:subject>civil engineering practice</dc:subject><dc:description>Laterally loaded slender piles present a classic soil–structure interaction problem where pile displacements and flexural demands are governed by the mobilized lateral resistance of the surrounding soil and the axial-bending capacity of the reinforced concrete section. In response to increasing pressure to reduce embodied emissions, this study develops LAVERCO, an optimization framework for cost- and CO2-efficient design of bored reinforced-concrete piles in cohesive soils subjected to combined lateral and axial actions. The framework integrates Eurocode-based geotechnical checks with full N–M section verification of the RC pile and applies a genetic algorithm over a multi-parametric grid of lateral load, vertical load, and undrained shear strength, using economic cost and embodied CO2 as alternative single objectives. Rank-based (Spearman) sensitivity analysis quantifies how actions, soil strength, and design variables influence the optimal solutions. The results reveal two consistent geometry regimes: CO2-optimal piles are systematically longer and slimmer, while COST-optimal piles are shorter and thicker. In both cases, the objective is dominated by pile length and is reduced by higher undrained shear strength; vertical load has a moderate direct effect, while horizontal load contributes mainly through deflection and bending checks. Feasibility improves significantly in stronger clays, and CO2-optimal geometries generally incur higher costs, clarifying the trade-off between economic and environmental performance. The framework provides explicit geometry-level guidance for selecting bored pile designs that balance cost and embodied CO2 across a wide range of soil and loading conditions and can be directly applied in both preliminary and detailed designs.</dc:description><dc:publisher>MDPI</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2026-01-19 11:28:08</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>96552</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 624.131:519.8</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 263996419</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.3390/buildings15244519</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 2075-5309</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
