<?xml version="1.0"?>
<metadata xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><dc:title>From WTO-centered governance to a layered trade architecture</dc:title><dc:creator>Logožar,	Klavdij	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>functional allocation</dc:subject><dc:subject>layered trade architecture</dc:subject><dc:subject>global trade governance</dc:subject><dc:subject>World Trade Organization</dc:subject><dc:subject>regional trade agreements</dc:subject><dc:subject>institutional differentiation</dc:subject><dc:description>Global trade governance is being reshaped as multilateral rulemaking and dispute settlement face persistent constraints. However, it remains unclear whether this development signals institutional decline or a layered allocation of governance functions across interconnected venues. This study develops a functional-allocation framework and examines rulemaking, enforcement, and coordination across the World Trade Organization (WTO), WTO-linked mechanisms, and regional trade agreements (RTAs). The framework distinguishes directly observable functional allocation from functional reallocation as a process-oriented interpretation of institutional change. The analysis combines a mapping of 282 RTA governance events entering into force between 2000 and 2025 with treaty content and institutional design data and a structured comparison of WTO core agreements, differentiated arrangements, enforcement supplements, and plurilateral initiatives. The findings identify a layered trade architecture rather than a simple shift away from the WTO. The WTO retains selected multilateral functions, differentiated arrangements sustain selective cooperation within its framework, and WTO-linked mechanisms supplement constrained appellate enforcement. RTAs provide additional venues for rulemaking, enforcement, and coordination. Among directly classified RTA events, formal adjudication increased from 76.0% in 2000–2004 to 100.0% in 2020–2025. Formal adjudication and institutionalized coordination are also positively associated with core substantive treaty depth. These patterns are consistent with functional allocation across a layered architecture, but do not establish that WTO constraints caused the observed institutional configurations.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-08-13 14:13:02</dc:date><dc:type>Znanstveno delo</dc:type><dc:identifier>99350</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>UDK: 339.54:061.1</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>COBISS_ID: 287731715</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>DOI: 10.3390/economies14080340</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ISSN pri članku: 2227-7099</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></metadata>
