20.500.12556/DKUM-14782 PRIMERJAVA IZBRANIH STRUKTURNIH ALTERNATIV PODJETJA BRANKO ČEPIN, S.P. S POMEMBNEJŠIMI KONKURENČNIMI GRADBENIMI PODJETJI A COMPARISON OF STRUCTURAL ALTERNATIVES OF THE COMPANY BRANKO ČEPIN, S.P. WITH SIMILAR COMPETING CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES Vsako podjetje se v začetku poslovanja srečuje s strukturnimi alternativami, kot so pravna oblika, lokacija in porazdelitev vodstvenih kadrov. Mnogi avtorji so mnenja, da je proučitev le-teh pomembna za uspešnost podjetja. Soočili smo se s teorijo vrst pravnih oblik v podjetju ter jih kasneje primerjali v praksi. Enako smo storili za ostali dve izbrani strukturni alternativi. Pravna oblika proučevanega podjetja je v primerjavi s konkurenti enaka, razen podjetja Gradisan, ki ima pravno obliko družbe z omejeno odgovornostjo. Našteli smo značilnosti ene in druge oblike ter ju kasneje primerjali med seboj. Ugotovili smo, da je oblika s. p. bolj primerna za manjša in srednje velika podjetja, d. o. o. pa zaradi večje kredibilnosti. Z vidika pravnih oblik sta proučevanemu podjetju najbolj podobna konkurenta Sebastjan Sevnik, s. p. in Kovačič Damijan, s. p., ki imata isto pravno obliko. Po lokaciji smo ugotovili, da je največji konkurent podjetje Gradisan, d. o. o., saj ima sedež v isti občini kot proučevano podjetje in sta »narazen« le 6 km. Ocenjevali smo z vidika cestnih povezav, parkirnih mest in možnosti za razvoj. Podatke o vodilnih kadrih konkurentov je bilo zelo težko najti, saj smo se omejili le na proučitev javno dostopnih podatkov. Lahko smo le sklepali, kakšen slog vodenja uporabljajo, glede na število zaposlenih in razmerjem med lastnikom in direktorjem podjetja. Od šestih zastavljenih tez, ki smo si jih postavili v uvodu, smo ovrgli le eno, ampak tudi ta delno drži. Teza pet, da ima proučevano podjetje boljšo lokacijo od konkurentov, ne drži popolnoma. Sedež ima namreč v isti občini kot konkurenčno podjetje Gradisan, d. o. o. V primerjavi z ostalima konkurentoma imata najboljšo možno lokacijo. Rezultat vseh tez je dobro začetno poznavanje teorije o izbranih strukturnih alternativah in o delovanju proučevanega podjetja. At the beginning every company has to face structural alternatives such as legal form, location and the division of the executive staff. Many authors believe that the examination of these alternatives is important for the success of the company. We have faced the theory of the kinds of legal forms of companies and later compared them in practice. We did the same with the other two structural alternatives. Legal form of the studied company is the same in comparison with the competitors, with the exception of the competitor Gradisan d. o. o., who has the legal form of a company with limited liability. We listed the characteristics of both forms and later on compared them with each other. We have come to the conclusion that the form of private entrepreneur is more suitable for small and middle-sized companies, while Ltd. is more suitable for larger companies because of its credibility. The most similar companies from the aspect of legal forms to our examined company are competitors Sebastjan Sevnik s. p. and Kovačič Damjan s. p., who have the same legal form. After examining the location we have come to the conclusion that the biggest competitor is Gradisan Ltd, who is located in the same municipality as the studied company. We were evaluating from the road connection, parking lot and development possibilities point of view. Information about the competitors’ executive staff was hard to find because we focused only on the examination of the data that was publicly accessible. We could only predict the style of direction they are using according to the number of employees and the relation between the owner and the manager of the company. From the six theses that were posed in the introduction, only one was disproved and even this one is half true. Thesis number five states that the examined company has a better location than the competitors’, which isn’t completely correct. Headquarters of the company is in the same municipality as the one of the competitor Gradisan. In comparison to the other two competitors, these two companies have the best possible location. The result of all these theses is good initial knowledge of theory about chosen structural alternatives and operation of the examined company. strukturne alternative pravna oblika lokacija vodenje zidarstvo in izdelava strojnih estrihov Branko Čepin s. p. Sebastjan Sevnik s. p. Kovačič Damjan s. p. Gradisan d. o. o. structural alternatives legal form location direction masonry and making of floor foundations Branko Čepin s. p. Sebastjan Sevnik s. p. Kovačič Damjan s. p. Gradisan Ltd true true false [B. Čepin] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Delo diplomskega seminarja/zaključno seminarsko delo/naloga 2010-07-05 22:26:19 2026-08-11 09:42:23 2026-08-12 03:16:03 2026-08-13 03:07:22 2010 0 Maribor 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 005.7 10506780 URN:SI:UM:DK:6FBKMWUT VS_Cepin_Barbara_2010.pdf VS_Cepin_Barbara_2010.pdf 1 6905A6441389CC0FA0862A3874CA6CB0 e3c82ffb3711561e641256ddf7623f24b8855fc4ace8fa8ed51a42214182b850 3c61fed1-7c04-11eb-bb7a-00155d0001ca https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=15932 Ekonomsko-poslovna fakulteta 0 0 0