20.500.12556/DKUM-19172 POMEN SODBE V ZADEVI METOCK ZA URESNIČEVANJE DERIVATIVNIH PRAVIC DRŽAVLJANOV TRETJIH DRŽAV THE IMPORTANCE OF THE JUDGEMENT IN METOCK CASE FOR DERIVATIVE RIGHTS OF THE THIRD COUNTRY CITIZENS V diplomskem delu obravnavam sodbo v zadevi Metock ter njen pomen za uresničevanje derivativnih pravic državljanov tretjih držav. Metock je kamerunski državljan, ki je sklenil zakonsko zvezo z državljanko Kameruna, ki je pridobila tudi britansko državljanstvo. Po prihodu na Irsko je vložil prošnjo za izdajo dovoljenja za prebivanje kot zakonec državljana Evropske unije, ki dela in prebiva na Irskem. Ta prošnja je bila zavrnjena, ker ni izpolnil pogoja v zvezi s predhodnim zakonitim prebivanjem v drugi državi članici, kot so to zahtevali irski predpisi. V zvezi z navedenim je Metock vložil tožbo za odpravo odločbe, s katero je Ministrstvo za pravosodje, enakost in reformo zakonodaje zavrnilo prošnjo za izdajo dovoljenja za prebivanje. Za razjasnitev vprašanja ali so irski predpisi skladni z Direktivo 2004/58/ES je irsko Vrhovno sodišče pred Sodišče Evropske unije vložilo predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe. Skozi obravnavo navedene sodbe v diplomskem delu obravnavam derivativne pravice državljanov tretjih držav. The diploma thesis discusses judgement in the case Metock and its importance for the derivative rights of the third country nationals. Metock and his wife were nationals of Cameroon. His wife has acquired the British nationality. Metock arrived to Ireland and applied for a residence card as the spouse of a Union citizen working and residing in Ireland. His application was rejected by the Minister for Justice on the ground that he did not satisfy the condition of prior lawful residence in another Member State required by the Irish regulations. Metock brought proceedings against that decision. Applicant in the main proceeding essentially submitted that the Irish regulations are not compatible with Directive 2004/58/EC. Since it considered that an interpretation of Directive 2004/58/EC was necessary to give judgment in the main proceedings, the High Court decided to stop the proceedings and refer questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling. By analysing this judgment derivative rights that belong to the third country nationals are in the core of the diploma thesis. Direktiva 2004/58/ES državljani tretjih držav pravice državljanov tretjih držav prosto gibanje prepoved diskriminacije združitev družine Directive 2004/58/EC third country nationals third country nationals rights free movement prohibition of discrimination family reunification true true false [E. Stagoj] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Diplomsko delo 2011-06-24 10:49:12 2011-07-14 13:27:10 2022-04-13 15:09:12 2023-12-25 03:09:03 2011 0 Maribor 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 34(043.2) 4239147 URN:SI:UM:DK:FRJKCNLK UNI_Stagoj_Emilija_2011.pdf UNI_Stagoj_Emilija_2011.pdf 1 6621AFC22699E64A98D68A19CD241E84 fd082ff31701a170ffb7ad5e451415a6f883523581043dfabea81aefefd0ccc6 4c653f02-7c05-11eb-bb7a-00155d0001ca 20.500.12556/dkum/1a53731d-7cfb-498f-9c4e-dd22b2141bc9 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=23077 Pravna fakulteta 0 0 0