20.500.12556/DKUM-36950 VPLIV NOVELE ZPOmK-1A NA VEČJO UČINKOVITOST URADA ZA VARSTVO KONKURENCE INFLUENCE OF AMENDMENT ZPOmK-1A ON LARGER EFFICIENCY OF COMPETITION PROTECTION OFFICE Avtorica v nalogi obravnava delovanje Urada RS za varstvo konkurence. Varstvo konkurence je v našem pravnem redu urejeno v konkurenčnem pravu kot delu tržnega prava. Konkurenčno pravo urejata dva zakona; Zakon o varstvu konkurence ZVK in Zakon o preprečevanju omejevanja konkurence ZPOmK-1. Avtorica se v nalogi osredotoča predvsem na delo Urada v skladu z določili prve novele ZPOmK-1. Avtorica v nalogi ugotavlja, da je bilo delo Urada pred sprejetjem novele ZPOmK-1A izredno oteženo. Urad namreč do sprejetja prve novele ni imel pravne podlage za obdelavo osebnih podatkov in tako ni mogel pridobiti podatkov s katerimi bi mnogokrat lahko dokazal kršitve konkurenčnih pravil. Nadalje je lahko le od sodišča zahteval izročitev kopij dokumentacije pomembne za njegovo delo, in tako ni mogel dostopati do podatkov, ki so jih zasegli drugi organi. Prav tako ni mogel sankcionirati fizičnih oseb, ki s podjetjem niso bile v zvezi, pa so kljub temu ovirale preiskavo pooblaščenih oseb Urada v podjetju, itd. S sprejetjem ZPOmK-1A je Urad pridobil pomembna pooblastila in pristojnosti za lažje oz. kakovostnejše opravljanje svojega dela. Avtorica se v nalogi podrobneje ukvarja s temi pooblastili in pristojnostmi. In this paper, the Author deals with operations carried out by the Competition protection office at the Ministry of economic development and technology of Republic of Slovenia. Competiotion protection in Slovenia is treated within the Competition protection law as a part of the broader Commercial law. The Competition protection law is governed by two Acts: Protection of Competition Act and Prevention of Restriction of Competition Act. In this paper, the Author focuses on activities of the Office in accordance with the provisions of the first amendment of Prevention of restriction of Competition Act. The Author finds that the work of the Office, before previouslly mentioned Amendment was adopted, was quite difficult to perform. By that time, the Office had no legal basis to treat personal data and thus was unable to collect data, which could, in many cases, help proving failure of competition rules. Furtermore, the Office could aquire copies of documents relevant to their work only from the Court thus not having any access to data seized by other authorities. The office couldn't impose any penalties agains physical persons that were not linked to the company under the investigation, but nevertheless impeded the investigation of authorized officers from the Office. The latest changes of Prevetion of Restriction of Competition Act (1A) gave the Office many important powers and jurisdictions thus making their work easier and much more effective. In this paper, the Author esp. elaborates those powers and jurisdictions. konkurenčno pravo Urad za varstvo konkurence osebni podatki poslovna skrivnost zaupni podatki preiskava program prizanesljivosti globa competiotion protection law competition protection office personal data trade secret confidential information investigation leniency programme fine true true false [S. Ojsteršek Turinek] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Diplomsko delo 2012-07-13 08:25:24 2012-07-17 13:11:45 2022-04-22 11:03:05 2023-12-29 03:24:11 2012 0 Maribor 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 34(043.2) 4383275 URN:SI:UM:DK:EVYIMJDJ UNI_Ojstersek_Turinek_Simona_2012.pdf UNI_Ojstersek_Turinek_Simona_2012.pdf 1 99C2F84558350908DB9B887B5B1BAAF1 4217ea3f3f6123aa94395b2c8c50053b0a1023f9463e84e03df021c0b0ef2820 de6388d5-7c07-11eb-bb7a-00155d0001ca 20.500.12556/dkum/72327bd5-cf99-45ba-9468-1a46b245bb52 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=48425 Pravna fakulteta 0 0 0