20.500.12556/DKUM-41259 VPLIV MEDIJEV NA KAKOVOST JAVNEGA ZDRAVSTVA MEDIA IMPACT ON THE QUALITY OF PUBLIC HEALTHCARE Razvoj slovenskega zdravstva v obdobju po drugi svetovni vojni je do leta 1992 potekal tako, da bi ga v vseh njegovih razsežnostih lahko poimenovali javno zdravstvo. A s spremembo prevladujočih družbenih ter političnih vrednot in razmer v Sloveniji, pa tudi zaradi nastopa koncesionarstva in prostovoljnih zdravstvenih zavarovanj, je bilo treba pojem javno zdravstvo v Sloveniji opredeliti na novo. Z nastopom koncesijskih razmerij so se namreč vzpostavile razmere, ko se v javni zdravstveni službi lahko ustvarjajo dobički, presežki iz dejavnosti, ki jih ni treba vračati v dejavnost. A ne glede na to, ali zdravnik dela kot koncesionar ali ne, ga pri delu praviloma vodijo moralne, profesionalne in formalnopravne norme kot ključne prvine vsakodnevne odločitvene paradigme. Pa vendar, je javno zdravstvo v Sloveniji takšno, kot si ga želimo? In kakšno vlogo pri tem, kako sleherna Slovenka in Slovenec doživljata obisk pri zdravniku, preventivni pregled, kirurški poseg itd., igrajo mediji? Ali je zaradi odmevnih zdravstvenih afer zaupanje v javno zdravstvo omajano? So zavarovanci zaradi medijskega poročanja o javnem zdravstvu bolj ozaveščeni? In kako medijsko poročanje doživljajo tisti, ki v javnem zdravstvu delajo, ki javne zdravstvene zavode vodijo? Tisti, ki so ves čas razpeti med politiko na eni in uporabniki zdravstvenih storitev na drugi strani? To so vprašanja, ki so predmet naše raziskave. Ključno vprašanje naše študije, na katerega bomo v magistrskem delu skušali odgovoriti s pomočjo zdravstvenih in medijskih strokovnjakov, pa: Ali mediji vplivajo na boljšo kakovost javnega zdravstva? Naša raziskava temelji na uporabi metode delno strukturiranega intervjuja, ki smo ga izvedli z izbranimi predstavniki medijske in zdravstvene stroke. Odgovore intervjuvancev smo analizirali z metodo tematske mreže. Ugotovili smo, da je eden ključnih problemov v pomanjkanju znanja. Novinarji premalo poznajo zdravstveni sistem. Po drugi strani pa tisti, ki delajo v tem sistemu, preslabo poznajo zahteve slovenskega medijskega prostora. Raziskava je pokazala tudi, da mediji nedvomno vplivajo na javno zdravstvo. A da niso tisti, ki narekujejo njegovo kakovost, pač pa imajo vlogo zunanjega opazovalca, zunanjega nadzornika. After World War II Slovenian healthcare slowly developed and until 1992 it had developed into what can easily be called public healthcare. After that came a significant change in social and political values and also in general conditions in the country. At this point first concessions emerged and with them voluntary health insurances which led into a new definition of the term “public healthcare”. Concessions made profits possible and these profits made in public health service need not be returned to the public health office for the public. But more importantly, it does not matter whether a doctor works as a concession holder or not, he or she must be driven by moral, professional and legal obligations while making everyday decisions. Still, the question remains: is Slovenian healthcare today what we have hoped it would be? What kind of a role do mass media play in terms of how Slovenian men and women experience doctor’s appointment, preventive care, surgery? Do we despite numerous health related affairs still trust our health system? Are people because of media reports more conscious about public healthcare? And what do of media reports related to health issues think those who work in the system, those who often find themselves right in the middle between politics and people? These are the questions to our research and our main focus is: do media in any way impact the quality of public healthcare? Our research is based on semi structured interviews with chosen media and health care representatives. We used thematic networking to analyse their answers. And we have discovered that one of the main problems is lack of knowledge. Journalists lack knowledge about health care system and those who work in this system do not understand media demands. Our research also showed that mass media do influence public health care, although it does not dictate its quality. Media plays a role of an observer or better, supervisor. - vpliv medijev - javno zdravstvo - kakovost - intervju - sodelovanje - media impact - public healthcare - quality - interview - cooperation true true false Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo 2013-08-19 08:26:02 2013-11-07 08:36:19 2022-05-04 03:06:56 2021-04-25 03:13:07 2013 0 KRANJ 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 7235091 URN:SI:UM:DK:20ZUR5RC MAG_Cretnik_Sodja_Maja_2013.pdf MAG_Cretnik_Sodja_Maja_2013.pdf 1 A5EF2680B2E376485E8C006B960F3CC9 3e31fa73f33e263ae3ea20cfe8f20ec1939b7c27d7b6aaeb63a6d8618269b337 22bb6f77-7c0a-11eb-bb7a-00155d0001ca https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=56971 Fakulteta za organizacijske vede 0 0 0