20.500.12556/DKUM-42910 KAKOVOST POVZEMANJA IN CITIRANJA V MAGISTRSKIH DELIH S PODROČJA DRUŽBOSLOVJA THE QUALITY OF SUMMARIZATION AND CITATION IN MASTER'S THESES IN THE FIELD OF SOCILA SCIENCES Diplomsko delo v ospredje postavlja dejstvo, da vsakemu avtorju določenega dela pripada pravica do priznanja njegovega avtorstva, hkrati pa se delo osredotoča na kakovostno povzemanje in citiranje v magistrskih nalogah s področja družboslovja in izpostavlja tudi problem plagiarizma. V teoretičnem delu diplomske naloge smo predstavili in se posvetili med drugim stopnji kakovosti pisanja znanstvenih oz. strokovnih del ter opredelili pojem plagiatorstvo in njegove oblike. Predstavili pa smo tudi nekaj programov za detekcijo plagiatov. V empiričnem delu naloge smo s pomočjo metode analize vsebine ocenjevali kakovost povzemanja in citiranja v magistrskih nalogah s področja družboslovja v obdobju 2008–2012, pri čemer smo znotraj vsakega magistrskega dela podrobno analizirali na osnovi slučajnostnega vzorčenja izbrane odstavke. Rezultati analiz kažejo, da (1) najdemo pri skoraj polovici analiziranih odstavkov vsaj eno izmed oblik nepravilnega prevzemanja in citiranja in da je skoraj vsak drugi odstavek, ki smo ga analizirali, problematičen. Vendar pa je naša analiza tudi pokazala, da (2) na obeh slovenskih univerzah lahko zasledimo »nepravilno dobesedno prevzemanje« kot najpogostejši tip neustreznih navedb, ki pa ga nismo uvrstili med hujše kršitve. Pri primerjavi obeh univerz smo ugotovili, da (3) ni zaslediti bistvene razlike med njima oziroma je le-ta minimalna ter da (4) na obeh univerzah v obdobju od leta 2008 do 2012 ni bilo izrazitih sprememb v smislu naraščanja ali padanja stopnje kršitev pravil prevzemanja in citiranja. This diploma project sets forward the fact that each author of a work should be entitled to recognition of his authorship. At the same time, the work focuses on the quality of summarization and citation in Master's theses in the field of social sciences, and highlights the problem of plagiarism. In the theoretical part of the thesis, we presented and focused on the quality of scientific and professional writing as well as defined the concept of plagiarism and its forms. We also introduced a number of plagiarism detection programs. In the empirical part, we used content analysis to evaluate the quality of summarization and citation in Master's theses in the field of social sciences between 2008 and 2012. In each thesis we analyzed randomly selected paragraphs. Results show that (1) almost half of the paragraphs analyzed contain irregular summarization and citation in at least one of its forms, and that almost every other paragraph analyzed was problematic. On the other hand, our analysis also revealed that (2) “incorrect literal summarization” can be found on both Slovenian universities as the most common type of non-conforming entries, however we didn’t count them as serious violations. When comparingthe two universities, (3) no significant differences were observed or a very small one, and (4) there were no significant changes from 2008 to 2012 in terms of increasing or decreasing the rate of summarization and citation violations. kakovost povzemanja in citiranja plagiat plagiatorstvo sankcije strokovna in znanstvena besedila kršenje avtorskih pravic quality of summarization and citation plagiarism sanctions scientific and professional writing copyright violation true true false [J. Vidovič] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Diplomsko delo 2013-10-30 09:58:19 2013-11-07 14:23:41 2022-05-08 03:06:53 2021-04-27 03:43:44 2013 0 Maribor 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 001.811(043.2) 20143624 URN:SI:UM:DK:UPVLNG24 UNI_Vidovic_Jasmina_2013.pdf UNI_Vidovic_Jasmina_2013.pdf 1 4DE3231011F1DE07A613F1A45421AF80 91480983e005f3f766b1bfd783e0cd5efd219b04490ff3486ef50d0a37e565e9 83813fda-7c0a-11eb-bb7a-00155d0001ca https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=60372 Filozofska fakulteta 0 0 0