20.500.12556/DKUM-46292 Večparametrski modeli ocenjevanja travniških nasadov Multiparameter models for assessment of meadow orchards Človek iz dneva v dan preoblikuje svoj življenjski prostor, tako je tudi tekom svoje evolucije poskrbel za nastanek travniških nasadov. Da bi dobili realno sliko travniških nasadov v današnjem času, smo se odločili za razvoj večparametrskih modelov ocenjevanja, pri čemer smo si pomagali z metodama DEX ter AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process). Obe metodi temeljita na večparametrskih modelih, kjer s pomočjo funkcij določimo, kateri parametri imajo večji pomen pri končni oceni posameznega nasada. Pri metodi DEX je bil uporabljen program DEXi, pri metodi AHP pa program Expert Choice, tako eden kot drugi sta pokazala svoje prednosti in slabosti. Bistvena razlika je v prikazu rezultatov in sicer program DEXi nam poda končne ocene v opisni obliki, zaradi česar je več travniških nasadov dobilo enako končno oceno in ni mogoče na enostaven način določiti razlike med njimi. Expert Choice je bolj natančen in hitro prilagodljiv na spremembe odločitvenega modela, končne ocene nam poda numerično. Rangiranje travniških nasadov je tako bolj natančno oziroma ne prihaja do enakih končnih ocen za več različnih travniških nasadov. Pri obeh metodah se pojavlja problem subjektivnosti odločevalca pri samih osnovnih ocenah in njegova naravnanost na kritičnost. V praksi bi lahko uporabili obe preučevani metodi, predvsem pa metodo AHP oziroma program Expert Choice, ki nam poda natančne numerične ocene dejanskega stanja v naravi. From day to day the man transforms his living space and so he also took care of the emergence of meadow orchards during his evolution. To get a realistic picture of meadow orchards nowadays, we decided to develop a multiparameter assessment models, where we used methods DEX and AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process). Both methods are based on multiparameter models, where with the help of function, we can determine which parameters have higher importance in the final evaluation of individual orchard. Program DEXi was used in method DEX and program Expert Choice in method AHP. Both of programs showed their advantages and disadvantages. The main difference between them is in the presentation of results, where the program DEXi gives us a final evaluation in narrative form and therefore more meadow orchards obtained the same final assesment. This makes it difficult to determine the difference between them in a simple way. Expert Choice is more accurate and able to adapt to changes in the decision model. It gives the final assesment in numerical form. This makes ranking of meadow orchards more accurate and therefore does not come to the same final evaluation for various meadow orchards. In both methods, there is a problem of subjectivity of decison maker at basic evaluation and his stance on the criticism. In practise, we could use both of studied methods, escpecially the method AHP, respectivelly program Expert Choice, which gives us precise numerical assesments of the actual situation in nature. travniški nasad ocenjevanje večparametrski model DEXi Expert Choice meadow orchard grading multiparameter model DEXi Expert Choice true true false Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo 2014-09-20 23:15:53 2014-10-01 13:29:55 2022-05-17 03:11:14 2021-05-04 03:30:55 2014 0 Maribor 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 URN:SI:UM:DK:AXU0XW6U MAG_Pamic_Saso_2014.pdf MAG_Pamic_Saso_2014.pdf 1 005C5271862939F2BA55080C07056081 ff5b37460ed695917cf0365eedf4ddb959f00816c44601922e9bfeae29e02abf 481b9c95-7c0b-11eb-bb7a-00155d0001ca https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=67644 Fakulteta za kmetijstvo in biosistemske vede 0 0 0