20.500.12556/DKUM-55014 Odgovornost letalskega prevoznika za zamudo - analiza odločitev Sodišča EU Liability of the air carrier for delay - analysis of the rulings of the EU Court Diplomska naloga analizira sodne odločbe in sicer tiste, katere je sprejelo Sodišče Evropske Unije in s katerimi je odgovorilo na zastavljena vprašanja nacionalnih sodišč v zvezi z razlago določb in s tem pravnih pojmov Uredbe 261/2004. Sodišča so tista, ki prek sodne prakse skrbijo, da pravo sledi svojemu namenu in da popravi napake, ki so nastale pri sestavi omenjenih aktov. S sodnimi odločbami je sodišče Evropske Unije podalo novo razlago določbam Uredbe 261/2004 in s tem onemogočilo nacionalnim sodiščem, da bi interpretirala določbe po svoje. Dokončno je tudi potrdilo, da akti Evropske skupnosti, ki so namenjeni varovanju potnikov niso v nasprotju z Montrealsko konvencijo in da je potrebno dosledno spoštovati pravna načela. Potnikom je bilo z eno pomembnejših sodnih odločb omogočeno zahtevati oziroma uveljavljati pravico do odškodnine v primeru, da je bil potnikov let odpovedan ali pa da je prišlo do velike zamude, tj. tiste, ki je daljša od treh ur. Vse to pa bi bilo težko dokazati, če ne bi Sodišče Evropske Unije podalo razlago pojma »čas prihoda«. The thesis analyses court judgments, namely those adopted by the European Court of Justice in answer to questions submitted by national courts on the interpretation of provisions and legal terms included in the Regulation 261/2004. Through the courts' case laws it is ensured that the law follows its intended purpose and corrects errors occurring in the structures of these laws. The legal judgements issued by the European Court of Justice have given new meanings to the provisions, of the Regulation 261/2004. ECJ also confirms, that the laws of the European Communities, which are intended to protect passengers, are not in conflict with the Montreal Convention and fully comply the principles of law. With one of the most important legal judgments passengers were able to demand their right for compensation in the event that the passengers flight was cancelled or if there was a long delay, i.e. longer that three hours. If not for the Europeans Court of Justice interpretation of the concept of »time of arrival«, all this would be hard to prove. Montrealska konvencija Uredba (ES) 261/2004 zamuda leta odškodnina čas prihoda zadeva Sturgeon zadeva IATA in ELFAA zadeva Nelson zadeva TUI Travel zadeva Germanwings zadeva Folkerts. Monteal Convention Regulation 261/2004 flight delay compensation time of arrival Sturgeon case IATA and ELFAA case Nelson case TUI Travel case Germanwings case Folkerts case true true false [F. Krpina] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Diplomsko delo/naloga 2015-09-22 15:32:42 2016-05-16 11:35:40 2022-06-07 03:07:55 2021-05-13 03:26:51 2015 0 Maribor 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 347.768(043.2) 5073451 URN:SI:UM:DK:BHZTSUK4 UN_Krpina_Frane_2015.pdf UN_Krpina_Frane_2015.pdf 1 D54E19D5152E07EB17029A08FD5765A9 1ecc6df570b2e75c5d6cf9c2537cfd7da430c89d48a60472b23eb37d2a7e22e4 b02f76d1-7c07-11eb-bb7a-00155d0001ca https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=81725 Pravna fakulteta 0 0 0