20.500.12556/DKUM-55632 Zaporna kazen med teorijo in prakso diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študija Imprisonment - Difference between Theory and Practice Pričujoče delo se loteva proučevanja zaporne kazni v sodobni (post)moderni družbi, po preobratu iz pretežno utilitarnega, na rehabilitacijo usmerjenega obdobja, v neoklasicistično doktrino reda in zakonitosti. Raziskovanje je usmerjeno na proučevanje vzrokov in posledic desetletja trajajoče hegemonije pravičniške doktrine. Diskrepanco med teorijo in prakso ter njene implikacije, ki se v prvi vrsti odražajo v več desetletij trajajoči krizi kaznovalnega sistema, soočimo na primeru Združenih držav Amerike. Negativne implikacije niso skoncentrirane le na ZDA, pač pa se je sistem delovanja, z vsemi svojimi učinki razširil domala po vsem svetu. Iz tega razloga je na drugi strani pozornost namenjena Finski, ki je svoj kazenski sistem, utemeljen prav tako na neoklasicistični doktrini, uspela ne le ohraniti stabilnega, pač pa ga je nadgradila v izjemno blago različico, ki privlači pozornost teoretikov in praktikov iz vsega sveta. Kot sodoben sistem kaznovanja in izvrševanja kazenskih sankcij, se pojavlja kot primer dobre prakse. V okvir sodobnega modela zaporne kazni je umeščena tudi rehabilitacija kot pravica, ki učinkuje zoper klasično kazen, ker nevtralizira škodljive učinke zaporne kazni ter restorativna pravičnost, ki rešuje nekatere zagate modernega kazenskega prava. The present work discusses prison sentencing in contemporary postmodern society after the reversion from a mainly utilitarian and rehabilitation-oriented approach to a neoclassical doctrine of law and order. This work is focussed on studying the causes and consequences of the decades-long hegemony of the »just deserts« doctrine. In the discrepancy between theory and practice and its implications, which have been reflected in a crisis of the penal system lasting several decades, we are particularly confronted by the case of the USA. However, the negative implications of the system are not concentrated only in the USA but are present with all its effects almost all over the globe. In contrast, our attention is then turned to the case of Finland, which, although has its own penalty system also grounded in the neoclassical doctrine, it has succeeded in not only maintaining a stable system but has evolved a “soft” variation which has attracted the attention of academics, theorists and experts worldwide. As a modern and future-oriented system of punishment and the enforcement of sentences, Finland appears as an example of good practice. In this framework of a contemporary model of imprisonment, is placed the rehabilitation as a right which acts against the effects of classical punishment because neutralises the harmful consequences of imprisonment and restorative justice which solves some of the quandaries of modern criminal law. kaznovanje zaporna kazen obsojenci resocializacija rehabilitacija diplomske naloge retribution law and order doctrine utilitarianism penal policy criminal policy prison sentence rehabilitation as a right restorative justice. true true false P. Globočnik] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Diplomsko delo 2015-12-07 19:41:29 2018-05-08 09:27:48 2022-06-09 03:09:41 2021-05-15 03:18:56 2015 0 [Ljubljana 2015 [Ljubljana 165 str. 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 343.8(043.2) 3539434 URN:SI:UM:DK:02FGMKVH UN_Globocnik_Petra_2015.pdf UN_Globocnik_Petra_2015.pdf 1 6C7505D7EC3D158F430335DB141B180A 85636ca0364dc0bf91ad4323cd6ad32c64b5dde85567d8dfe361cf4195f097e4 d4dd0acb-7c0b-11eb-bb7a-00155d0001ca https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=83645 Fakulteta za varnostne vede 0 0 0