20.500.12556/DKUM-64614 NEPRIŠTEVNOST KOT IZKLJUČITVENI RAZLOG ODGOVORNOSTI ZA PREKRŠEK INSANITY AS THE REASON FOR EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY FOR MISDEMEANOUR Magistrska naloga obravnava področje prekrškov v okviru upravnega prava, konkretno v policiji. Razdeljena je na teoretični in na empirični del. V teoretičnem delu so uvodoma opredeljene temeljne zakonske ureditve ter področje obravnavanja prekrškov, predvsem z vidika delovanja policije. Opisan je tudi institut neprištevnosti, ki poleg institutov silobrana, skrajne sile, pravne in dejanske zmote ter prisiljenosti izključuje odgovornost za kazniva dejanja in za prekršek. Nadalje sledi obravnava organov za odločanje v postopkih o prekrških, opis postopkov o prekrških in povezane sankcije ter obravnava področja neprištevnosti. V empiričnem delu naloge je predstavljenih dvajset ilustrativnih primerov situacij, katere obravnavajo policisti na kraju dogodka in policisti z ustrezno izobrazbo za izdajo odločbe o prekršku. Za vsak ilustrativni primer so opisani ustaljeni postopki ravnanja policistov in analiza ter predlog za dosledno zakonito obravnavo, ki odstopa od ustaljene prakse. Podani so tudi argumenti za spremembo ustaljene prakse. V zaključku naloge ugotavljamo, da praksa ne sledi zakonskim zahtevam in navodilom vrhovnega sodišča, pač pa navodilom nadrejenih in učnim pripomočkom. Na podlagi analize ocenjujemo, da bi bilo potrebno prakso spremeniti. Spremembe zahtevajo sledenje zakonskim predpisom in ne navodilom nadrejenih ter učnim pripomočkom. Poleg prej navedenih sprememb pa je potrebno ustrezno usposabljanje policistov in priprava ustreznih učnih gradiv. Master's thesis deals with the area of offenses under administrative law, specifically in the police. It is divided into theoretical and empirical part. The theoretical part initially defined the basic regulation and the misdemeanor proceedings, mainly from the perspective of the police work. It also outlines the Institute of insanity, which in addition to the institutions of self-defense, extreme necessity, the legal and factual mistake and compelled excludes liability for criminal offenses and misdemeanors. Furthermore, the following discussion of decision making bodies in the misdemeanor proceedings, the description of the misdemeanors and the associated penalties, and deals with the scope of insanity. In the empirical part of the dissertation presents twenty illustrative examples of situations that police officers treated on the spot and police officers with the proper education to issue a decision on the offense. For each illustrative example describes the established procedures of conduct of police officers and an analysis and a proposal for a consistent legal treatment, which differs from the usual practice. Arguments are given for change of established practices. In conclusion, we find that legal requirements and instructions of the Supreme Court is not followed by practice but by the instructions of superiors and teaching tools. Based on the analysis, we estimate that it would be necessary to change the practice. The changes require following the regulations and not the instructions of superiors and teaching tool. In addition to the aforementioned changes, the need for proper training of police officers and preparation of appropriate teaching materials is necessary. Postopek o prekršku upravni postopek neprištevnost policija prekrškovni organ. Misdemeanor proceedings administrative proceedings sanity police misdemeanor authority. true true false [M. Šafarič] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2016-11-04 15:38:08 2017-03-08 13:37:28 2022-07-06 03:05:43 2019-07-11 14:07:42 2016 0 Maribor 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 343.91-056.34 (043.3) 5324587 URN:SI:UM:DK:LDRTEX9A MAG_Safaric_Mojmir_2016.pdf MAG_Safaric_Mojmir_2016.pdf 1 8C399620334A97F4230A841DB802BC2D 5b794ae1670309557cd4d7c43da1a7fd09b864287827541d98226a22969b39ef d837bccb-7c0d-11eb-bb7a-00155d0001ca https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=108171 Pravna fakulteta 0 0 0