20.500.12556/DKUM-68822 Clarifying power, domination, and exploitation between "classical" and "Foucauldian" concepts of power Objašnjenje moći, dominacije i eksploatacije između „klasičnog” i „fukoovskog” poimanja moći The paper examines two ubiquitous concepts of power: the "classical sociological" concept which draws on Max Weber's definition of power, and the "Foucauldian" concept which stems from Michel Foucault's genealogical works. Three main theses are argued for. First, the two concepts are not, in most respects, as radically different as it is usually claimed. It is demonstrated that both can make room for different sources of power, for understanding power in a non-reified way, for the fact that power is rarely completely centralised, etc. Second, in those respects in which the two concepts actually differ, the classical view of power is more convincing and useful than the Foucauldian one. It is demonstrated that the Foucauldian view is implicitly positivist in the normative domain and thus unable to differentiate between power and domination, and that it succumbs to errors of methodological holism (i. e. undertheorising agency). Third, it is argued that the classical sociological view allows to analytically distinguish between power, domination and exploitation. These three categories are shown not to be synonymous and to carry with them importantly different sociological implications. It is demonstrated that exploitation cannot merely refer to any process of unpaid appropriation of surplus as obvious false positives are generated from this definition. Nonetheless, such appropriation is the fundamental characteristic which differentiates exploitation from domination (but not power itself), and this reveals an important sociological implication for the dynamics of struggle of the exploited against exploitation in contrast to the struggle of the dominated against the dominators. U radu se istražuju dva sveprisutna poimanja moći: "klasično sociološko", koje se oslanja na definiciju moći Maxa Webera, i "fukoovsko", koje proizlazi iz genealoških radova Michela Foucaulta. Zagovaraju se tri glavne teze. Prvo, ta dva koncepta u većini aspekata nisu onoliko drastično različita koliko se to najčešće tvrdi. Dokazuje se da u okviru obaju koncepata postoji prostor za različite izvore moći, za tumačenje moći bez opredmećivanja, za činjenicu da je moć rijetko potpuno centralizirana i slično. Drugo, u onim aspektima u kojima se ta dva koncepta doista razlikuju, klasično je poimanje moći uvjerljivije i korisnije nego Foucaultovo. Dokazuje se da je fukoovsko gledište implicitno pozitivističko u normativnom aspektu pa je stoga u okviru toga gledišta nemoguće razlikovati moć i dominaciju, kao i to da ono podliježe pogreškama metodološkog holizma (odnosno, nedovoljno razmatra djelovanje). Treće, tvrdi se da klasično sociološko gledište omogućuje analitičko razlikovanje moći, dominacije i eksploatacije. Dokazuje se da te tri kategorije nemaju jednako značenje te da svaka od njih podrazumijeva znatno različite sociološke implikacije. Pokazuje se da se eksploatacija ne odnosi na bilo koji proces neplaćenog prisvajanja viška s obzirom na to da se prihvaćanjem te definicije očito izvode lažni zaključci. Ipak, takvo je prisvajanje temeljna karakteristika prema kojoj se eksploatacija razlikuje od dominacije (ali ne i moći), a to otkriva važnu sociološku implikaciju za dinamiku borbe eksploatiranih protiv eksploatacije, različitu od borbe dominiranih nad vršiteljima dominacije. power domination exploitation Foucault value-neutrality moč izkoriščanje Foucault dominacija vrednostna nevtralnost true true true Angleški jezik Hrvaški jezik Članek v reviji 2017-10-24 13:52:55 2017-10-24 13:54:50 2024-02-16 13:52:25 2019-07-26 11:31:56 2017 0 0 str. 151-175 št. 2 Letn. 47 2017 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0350-154X 316.46:1Foucault M. 2899202 23395336 10.5613/rzs.47.2.2 0350-154X URN:SI:UM:DK:K4KKUMCX Revija_za_sociologiju_2017_Rutar_Clarifying_Power,_Domination,_and_Exploitation_Between_“Classical”_and_“Foucauldian”_Concepts_of_Power.pdf Revija_za_sociologiju_2017_Rutar_Clarifying_Power,_Domination,_and_Exploitation_Between_“Classical”_and_“Foucauldian”_Concepts_of_Power.pdf 1 7347183DC9AE6DAF48D440698C4141FF 24e1a041ea47c21be88b07c6926304d839d4f3371ca41fd13bbbfc7278aaf7b9 748fbf36-7c0f-11eb-bb7a-00155d0001ca 20.500.12556/dkum/77d70a8d-f81e-409f-978d-2441e5171f71 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=119840 https://hrcak.srce.hr/187354 1 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=119839 Filozofska fakulteta 0 0 0