20.500.12556/DKUM-71321 Slabosti obvezne mediacije Disadvantages of mandatory mediation Eno od glavnih načel mediacije je njena prostovoljnost, ki pa utegne biti v nasprotju z institutom obvezne mediacije, ki strankam ne daje svobodne izbire o sodelovanju. Posledica takšne ureditve je postopek, ki je v končnem rezultatu daljši in dražji, kar nadalje nasprotuje bistvenima vrlinama mediacije, ekonomičnosti in hitrosti. V slovenskem pravnem redu je obvezna mediacija specifično urejena predvsem v Zakonu o brezplačni pravni pomoči, ki nalaga obveznost mediacije prosilcem take pomoči. Ob takšni obveznosti se poraja vprašanje smiselnosti obvezne mediacije kot pravnega koncepta. Obvezna mediacija namreč predstavlja procesno oviro, saj omejuje posameznika pri dostopu do sodnega varstva. V članku so predstavljeni statistični podatki, ki izkazujejo uspešnost mediacije na slovenskih sodiščih v času od uveljavitve Zakona o alternativnem reševanju sodnih sporov. Le-ti izkazujejo relativno slabe rezultate, tako na strani podajanja soglasij kot z vidika uspešnih rešitev sporov. Na podlagi teh podatkov pa ni videti, da bi ukrep obvezne mediacije varoval katerokoli pravno vrednoto, niti se tak ukrep ne zdi sorazmeren. Zaključiti kaže, da je mediacija kot pravni institut sicer potrebna in njeno zagotavljanje vsekakor nujno, vendar pa se obveznost mediiranja zdi pretiran ukrep. One of the main principles of mediation is its voluntariness. However, said principle may be in conflict with the concept of mandatory mediation, also known as court ordered/mandated mediation, which does not give its parties the freedom to choose whether they are willing to participate. Such a system ultimately results in a more expensive and longer procedure, thus opposing two other benefits of mediation, economical decisions and rapid settlements. In Slovene legal system mandatory mediation can mostly be found in Legal Aid Act (Zakon o brezplačni pravni pomoči) which forces the parties applying for aid to participate in the process of mediation. Lack of reasoning for this kind of obligation raises the question of rationale behind mandatory mediation as a legal concept. Being an obstacle in the proceedings, mandatory mediation is limiting one’s right to judicial protection. The article presents statistical data showing the rate of success of mediation in Slovene courts since the Act on Alternative Dispute Resolution in Judicial Matters (Zakon o alternativnem reševanju sodnih sporov) came in force. Data show relatively poor results, both from the aspect of parties consenting to mediation and of successful dispute resolutions. Based on given data the measure of mandatory mediation seems to neither safeguard any legal value, nor does it appear to be proportional. In conclusion it can be deduced that mediation is a necessary legal institute and the courts should be offering its programs to willing parties. However, the obligation to mediate seems to be an excessive measure. spori reševanje alternativne oblike nepravdni postopek mediacija mandatory mediation alternative dispute resolution principle of voluntariness true false true Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Univerza v Mariboru Strokovno delo 2018-08-02 10:10:00 2018-08-02 10:11:09 2022-08-01 20:45:37 2019-07-11 18:38:11 2015 0 0 str. 57-75 št. 1 Letn. 7 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 1855-7147 347.919.1 246384128 286253568 1855-7147 URN:SI:UM:DK:G8GEHIOS LeXonomica_2015_Hederih_Slabosti_obvezne_mediacije.pdf LeXonomica_2015_Hederih_Slabosti_obvezne_mediacije.pdf 1 9E9778BFB3DB5D78A835E5143B2B5934 b0117517439d7fa7547d8f10684e85eb7e73dfb4dc538dbac3516380a5dba8b1 27c851fb-7c10-11eb-bb7a-00155d0001ca 20.500.12556/dkum/782b5133-e4cc-4e0e-91c2-55f0b5c84b6a https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=126952 http://journals.um.si/index.php/lexonomica/article/view/14 1 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=126955 Pravna fakulteta LeXonomica 0 0 0