20.500.12556/DKUM-73776 Razkorak med javno in znanstveno podobo izgorelosti The difference between the public and academic image of burnout Izgorelost je bila v zadnjih desetletjih deležna veliko pozornosti raziskovalcev. Večje zanimanje za fenomen pa je mogoče opaziti tudi pri širši javnosti. Navedeno se odraža zlasti na internetnih virih, kjer lahko zasledimo veliko objav, člankov in komentarjev na omenjeno temo. Raziskovalci opozarjajo, da širša javnost internetne medije uporablja kot glavni vir informacij o duševnih motnjah in stanjih. Glavni težavi tovrstnega početja pa sta vprašljiva kvaliteta in verodostojnost informacij. Netočne informacije lahko posledično tudi vplivajo na neustrezno strokovno pomoč ali zanemarjanje duševnih težav. Iz tega razloga smo raziskali, kakšen je razkorak med znanstveno in javno podobo izgorelosti. S pomočjo analize vsebine in metodoloških smernic analiziranja medijskih objav smo raziskali, kako pogosto se tematike v okviru izgorelosti iz znanstvene literature pojavljajo v medijih in kakšna je skladnost teh tematik z znanstvenimi spoznanji oziroma v kolikšni meri se pojavljajo odstopanja. V nadaljevanju nas je zanimala pogostost pojavljanja tematik in skladnost z znanstveno literaturo razlikuje glede na to, ali je zapis zapisala strokovna oseba, novinar, širša javnost ali oseba z izkušnjo izgorelosti. Ugotovili smo, da so določene tematike v okviru izgorelosti v medijih zastopane v večji meri (pri nekaterih so razlike v tem, kako pogosto se pojavljajo, odvisne od avtorjev) ter da se pri določenih tematikah pojavljajo večja neskladja z znanstvenimi spoznanji. Rezultati nakazujejo potrebo po ozaveščanju in intervencijah, ki bi ta razkorak zmanjšale, ter predstavljajo izhodišče za smernice medijskega poročanja o izgorelosti. Burnout has been in the focus of the researchers for the last few decades. Higher attention for this phenomenon by the general public can also be observed. This is to be noticed especially in the various internet sources, where high quantity of posts, articles and commentaries can be traced. The researchers have been warning that the general public uses these internet sources as the main source of information about mental disturbances and states. The main obstacle of such approach is a questionable quality and credibility of information. Inaccurate information can consequently influence inadequate professional help or neglect of mental problems. This is the reason why a research has been done on what the difference between the professional and public image of burnout is. With the content analysis and methodological guidelines of how to analyse media publications a research has been done on congruence of these topics with academic findings and to what extent deviations occur. Furthermore, we were interested in how frequently these burnout topics occur and at the same time how congruent they are with the academic literature based on who the author is: whether this is a professional, a journalist, general public or a person with a burnout experience. It has been found out that some certain burnout topics are more frequently represented in the media (with some differences occur in their frequency based on authors) and that with various certain topics larger incongruence can be noticed than with other academic findings. The results indicate the need for awareness and interventions, which could lessen the difference and represent a basis for the guidelines of the media publishing on burnout. Izgorelost internetni viri skladnost z znanstveno literaturo avtorji zapisov smernice medijskega poročanja Burnout internet sources congruence with the academic literature authors of publications guidelines for the media publishing true true false [N. Robnik] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2019-06-13 07:39:01 2019-07-22 14:00:23 2022-08-02 06:17:57 2019-07-26 11:53:09 2019 0 Maribor 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 159.944:004.738.5(043.2) 24664840 URN:SI:UM:DK:JVTTRRLM MAG_Robnik_Nika_2019.pdf MAG_Robnik_Nika_2019.pdf 1 E9690EAD1055DC73255B432EA4F0600A 94f50ac6969bc04094323b095845e9a1f41c2aafb323114e71316bbe5d330111 c5f2a008-7c10-11eb-bb7a-00155d0001ca 20.500.12556/dkum/036f3edd-2202-4a2d-890d-e852603a767f https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=135037 Filozofska fakulteta 0 0 0