20.500.12556/DKUM-75392 Primerjava poročil o delu policije in državnega tožilstva za leti 2012 in 2017 diplomsko delo visokošolskega študijskega programa Informacijska varnost Comparison of reports on the work of the police and the public prosecutor Živimo v času, ko je zagrešenih kaznivih dejanj zelo veliko, o tem mediji poročajo praktično vsak dan. Vse pogosteje se pojavljajo organiziran kriminal, trgovina z orožjem in mamili ter pranje denarja, a druga kazniva dejanja ne zaostajajo. Glede na storjena dejanja je ovadenih relativno malo osumljencev, še manjše je število obtoženih in še nižje število pravnomočno obsojenih. V predkazenskem delu preiskovanja je v središču delo policije in njena učinkovitost, delu policije pa sledi delo državnega tožilca in sodišča. Skozi sita posameznih udeležencev postopka se število osumljencev, obtožencev in obsojencev močno zmanjša. Temu osipu pravimo kriminalitetni lijak. V okviru diplomskega dela je bila opravljena primerjalna analiza statističnih podatkov policije in državnega tožilstva za leti 2012 in 2017. Direktne primerjave so skorajda nemogoče, saj se zajemanje podatkov obeh institucij zelo razlikuje. Na podlagi podatkov je bilo kljub temu ugotovljeno, da le manjši del kaznivih dejanj sproži ustrezno sodbo. Od vseh zaznanih kaznivih dejanj je bilo obsojenih osumljencev zelo malo, le 1,5 % pa jih je prestajalo tudi zaporno kazen. Vrhovno državno tožilstvo pojasnjuje, da državno tožilstvo zavrže velik del ovadb, in sicer predvsem zaradi nezadostne dokazne podlage za utemeljen sum. We live in a time when many criminal offences are committed and the media reports about them on a daily basis. This is becoming increasingly true of organised crime, arms trade, drug trafficking, and money laundering, with other criminal offences not too far behind. According to the offences committed, relatively few suspects are accused or charged and even less are convicted. The pre-trial part of the investigation focuses on the work and effectiveness of the police, followed by the work of the state prosecutor and the court. By screening individual participants in the proceedings the number of suspects, accused, and convicted persons is greatly reduced. We call this decrease a crime funnel. A comparative analysis of the statistical data of the police and the state prosecutor's office for 2012 and 2017 was conducted, but direct comparisons are almost impossible since the data capture of the two institutions varies significantly. Based on the data we have found that only a small proportion of the offences result in a proper verdict. Of all the criminal offences committed very few suspects were convicted and only 1.5% were imprisoned. The Office of the State Prosecutor General explains that the state prosecutor's office dismisses a large part of the charges, mainly because of insufficient evidence to support a reasonable suspicion. diplomske naloge kaznivo dejanje predkazenski postopek sodišče kriminal zaporna kazen criminal offence pre-trial process court crime prison sentence true true false [M. Ludvik] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Diplomsko delo/naloga 2019-11-04 11:44:51 2020-01-15 11:24:48 2022-08-09 11:17:19 2020-01-16 03:13:34 2019 0 Ljubljana 2019 Ljubljana VII, 42 str. 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 343.1(043.2) 3825898 URN:SI:UM:DK:I2IGKXVQ VS_Ludvik_Melita_2019.pdf VS_Ludvik_Melita_2019.pdf 1 878A91087593F2AD87145FC5420FB7AB 7602cdeda5583a5f86524194e805f8c8d3df10f706506e2a995734805bfaf3db 2a1adb82-7c11-11eb-bb7a-00155d0001ca 20.500.12556/dkum/f70f0679-1f1b-4bb3-b24c-5af95c5af93f https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=139918 Fakulteta za varnostne vede 0 0 0