20.500.12556/DKUM-76094 Comparing counterintelligence and counterterrorism - similarities, issues and solutions Purpose: This paper aims to discuss and compare counterintelligence and counterterrorism, particularly in the aftermath of the Cold War and the rise of new forms of non-state terrorism, and critically examine the tendency of western liberal democracies to assign counterterrorism tasks to services traditionally involved in counterintelligence. The aim is therefore to identify similarities, differences and issues that arise between these two activities. In addition, some solutions to the issues presented are proposed. Methods:Models and concepts are developed and presented through analysis of primary and secondary sources. Several aspects are identified, leading to a comparative analysis being conducted.Findings: Counterintelligence and counterterrorism seem very similar at first glance, but differ from each other in certain important respects. They both lie on a spectrum between a ‘law enforcement model’ and an ‘intelligence model’, and can overlap when targeting state-sponsored terrorism or state and non-state actors’ intelligence activities. Yet they vary substantially when dealing with risks, time sensitivity and the sharing of information, and ignoring them can have a significant impact on national security.Research Limitations: Besides the secret nature of intelligence and, therefore, limited access to information, the paper primarily focuses only on states’ security apparatus and does not consider other political, societal or psychological actors or approaches. Practical Implications: In the paper, several solutions derived from the principle of the separation of counterintelligence and counterterrorism are presented for policymakers, while also calling for the establishing of sharing and coordination bodies.Value: This paper counters the prevailing paradigm that overemphasises the role of the traditional services involved in counterintelligence as part of the fight against modern terrorism. The findings and conclusions are intended for political, professional and wider public audiences. Namen prispevka: Namen prispevka je obravnavati ter primerjati protiobveščevalne in protiteroristične dejavnosti, še posebej z vidika konca hladne vojne in pojava novih oblik terorizma, ter kritično obravnavati nagnjenja zahodnih liberalnih demokracij, ki vlogo protiteroristične dejavnosti potiskajo v organizacije, ki so bile tradicionalno zadolžene za protiobveščevalno dejavnost. Cilj je torej predstaviti podobnosti, razlike ter dileme. Glede na identificirane dileme so predstavljene tudi nekatere rešitve. Metode:Za razvoj modelov in konceptov je bila uporabljena analiza primarnih in sekundarnih virov. Identificiranih je bilo več vidikov, na podlagi katerih je bila nato opravljena primerjalna analiza. Ugotovitve:Protiobveščevalna in protiteroristična dejavnost se zdita na prvi pogled podobni, vendar obstajajo med njima pomembne razlike. Obe ležita na spektru med ‘modelom organov pregona’ in ‘obveščevalnim modelom’ ter se na nekaterih področjih tudi prekrivata, kot je spremljanje državno-sponzoriranega terorizma ter terorističnih skupin, ki uporabljajo obveščevalno dejavnost. Dejavnosti se razlikujeta predvsem na področju tveganj, časovne občutljivosti ter uporabe informacij. Neupoštevanje teh razlik ima lahko pomembne posledice za nacionalno varnost.Omejitve: Poleg tajne narave obveščevalne dejavnosti in s tem omejenega dostopa do informacij se prispevek osredotoča predvsem na varnostni aparat države in se hkrati izogiba ostalim političnim, družbenim ter psihološkim akterjem in pristopom k tematiki. Praktična uporabnost:V prispevku je predstavljenih več rešitev za odločevalce, ki izhajajo iz načela delitve protiobveščevalne in protiteroristične funkcije. Izražena je tudi potreba po centru, ki bi omogočal koordinacijo in izmenjavo informacij. obveščevalne službe varnostne složbe protiobveščevalna dejavnost protiteroristična dejavnost organi pregona true true true Angleški jezik Slovenski jezik Znanstveno delo 2020-04-16 07:54:06 2020-04-16 07:54:06 2024-03-01 21:46:14 2020-04-21 03:13:25 2018 0 0 str. 163-181 št. 2 Letn. 20 2018 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 351.746.1:343.3 99492352 3581930 1580-0253 URN:SI:UM:DK:OSKNAEAC RAZ_Britovsek_Jaros_2018.pdf RAZ_Britovsek_Jaros_2018.pdf 1 F3BA92E959221DEA1D8C6652F18BBC4B 50f8093373de3cbb89d03f5bf0d85a4ce7b88f40cc56c83b612cd74e6f214919 43848348-7c11-11eb-bb7a-00155d0001ca 20.500.12556/dkum/7676b88e-6f03-4b88-bf22-310f91fc0d8b https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=141350 https://www.fvv.um.si/rv/arhiv/2018-2/02_Britovsek_rV_2018-2.html 1 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=141351 https://www.fvv.um.si/rv/arhiv/2018-2/02_Britovsek_rV_2018-2.pdf 1 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=141352 Fakulteta za varnostne vede Varstvoslovje 0 0 0