20.500.12556/DKUM-77714 Pravica stranke do dokaza po ZPP in v sodni praksi magistrska naloga Party`s right to evidence in legal practice and in civil procedure law Strankina pravica do dokaza je zelo visoko varovana pravica. Gre namreč za varstvo temeljne človekove pravice na najvišji ravni, v okviru Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah in temeljnih svoboščinah. Na nacionalni ravni pravico varuje Ustava RS in v tem konkretnem delu tudi Zakon o pravdnem postopku. Seveda pravica ni zgolj del civilnega prava, temveč tudi kazenskega. Prva težava je že z možnostjo prenosa ureditve oziroma zaščite te pravice s kazenskega na civilno pravo. Prej omenjena Konvencija se sicer uporablja tako v kazenskem kot tudi v civilnem postopku, gre pa za najsplošnejše varstvo. Tudi Ustava RS ima zapisano zelo splošno definicijo varovanja pravice, ki je obravnavana v tem delu. Dejstvo je, da se ureditev v pravdni postopek ne more prenesti z ureditve v kazenskem postopku. Pomembno vlogo pri oblikovanju tako splošnih pravic imajo seveda sodišča. Najvišje varstvo torej nudi Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice, ki veliko težavo kršitve te pravice vidi v obrazložitvi nacionalnih sodišč o (ne)uporabi dokazov, pri čemer sodnik uporablja prosto presojo dokazov. Sodišče, ki odloča v konkretnem sporu med strankama, mora svoje odločitve zmeraj dobro obrazložiti; ta standard je bolje razložen v samem magistrskem delu, na splošno pa je mogoče povzeti, da mora obrazložitev sodnika prepričati tako stroko kot tudi stranke, torej profesionalca in laika. Stranki mora biti za pravilno izveden postopek med drugim dana možnost, da je prisotna ob izvajanju dokazov, pri čemer velja tudi načelo neposrednosti, po katerem sodnik ne sme sodelovati zgolj z eno stranko. Stranki mora biti omogočeno tudi aktivno sodelovanje pri zasliševanju prič in izvedencev ter podajanje svojih pravnih naziranj. Za sodnika pa obstaja tudi možnost, da ob omogočanju pravice stranki do dokaza naleti na pravico nasprotne stranke, na primer pravico do zasebnosti. V tem primeru mora sodnik, ki vodi postopek, tehtati, kateri pravici dati prednost, pri čemer mora presoditi, katera pravica prinaša večjo korist oziroma manjšo škodo. The party's right to evidence is highly protected right. Namely, it is about the protection of fundamental human rights at the highest level, within the framework of the European Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, at the national level the right is protected by the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia and in this specific part by the Civil Procedure Act. Of course, justice is not only part of civil law but also of criminal law. The first problem is already in the possibility of transferring the regulation of protection of this right from criminal to civil law. While the beforementioned Convention applies to both criminal and civil proceedings, it is the most general protection. The Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia also has a very general definition of the protection of rights, which is discussed in this part. The fact is, however, that regulation in civil proceedings cannot be transferred from regulation in criminal proceedings. Of course, the courts play a major role in shaping such universal rights. The highest protection is therefore provided by the European Court of Human Rights, which sees a major problem of violation of this right in the reasoning of national courts on the (non) use of evidence, where the judge uses the free assessment of evidence. The court, which must always give a good explanation of its decision in a concrete dispute between the parties, this standard is better explained in the work itself, and in general it can be concluded that the judge's reasoning must convince both the profession and the parties, that is professionals and the layman. Fort a properly conducted procedure, the party must, among other things, be given the opportunity to be present at the presentation of evidence, and the principle of immediacy also applies, according to which a judge may not cooperate with only one party. The party must also be able to take an active part in the examination of witnesses and experts and to give their legal views. However, there is also the possibility fort the judge to encounter the right of the other party, such as the right to privacy, when granting the party the right to evidence. In this case, the judge conducting the proceedings must weigh which right to give priority and needs to assess which right brings greater benefit or less harm. civilno pravo kontradiktornost pravica do izjave dejstva dokazovanje civil law contradiction right to a statement facts proving true true false T. Škerget] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Magistrsko delo/naloga 2020-09-11 08:26:26 2020-10-12 08:59:41 2022-08-09 17:06:43 2020-10-13 03:22:59 2020 0 [Maribor 0 [Maribor 48 str. 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 347.94(043.3) 32068355 URN:SI:UM:DK:Y8PGYTTA MAG_Skerget_Tomaz_2020.pdf MAG_Skerget_Tomaz_2020.pdf 1 B4678D32CB93D5B279350693E8EDB98D a760bafcc89b7da20a7d076c31c20a0daad00648a64adf1cc0aa7bdbc421fb47 d72305ff-7c11-11eb-bb7a-00155d0001ca 20.500.12556/dkum/3a859f3c-374f-4bd7-87b1-c558b0900209 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=145903 Pravna fakulteta 0 0 0