20.500.12556/DKUM-89702 Critical review of the use of the Rorschach in European courts In relation to the admissibility of evidence obtained using projective personality tests arose in F v. Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatam (2018). The Court of Justice of the European Union has held that an expert's report can only be accepted if it is based on the international scientific community's standards, but has refrained from stipulating what these standards are. It appears timely for European psychologists to decide what standards should be applied to determine whether or not a test is appropriate for psycholegal use. We propose standards and then apply them to the Rorschach because it was used in this case and is an exemplar of projective tests. We conclude that the Rorschach does not meet the proposed standards and that psychologists should abstain from using it in legal proceedings even in the absence of a clear judicial prohibition. psychology law forensic assessment courts professional standard ethics evidential value acceptability projective test Rorschach psihologija pravo forenzična ocena sodišča poklicni standardi etika dokazna vrednost sprejemljivost projektivni test true false true Australian Academic Press Angleški jezik Slovenski jezik Znanstveno delo 2024-08-06 13:11:45 2024-08-06 13:36:35 2024-08-07 03:41:28 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2022 0 0 Str. 183-205 Št. 2 Letn. 29 2022 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 2021-05-26 159.9:340.6 64989955 10.1080/13218719.2021.1894260 1321-8719 Areh-2022-Critical_review_of_the_use_of_the_Ro.pdf Areh-2022-Critical_review_of_the_use_of_the_Ro.pdf 1 79B6DB429419AD0D1F2D75F95F630D80 28dbba09bcd82cb18c53e42fa1faa4f116ad3eadf5f1bbfa573af867e5ddaf18 505a9696-53e7-11ef-82b3-00155d000105 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=182052 https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.1894260 0 5a3eb7fa-53e7-11ef-82b3-00155d000105 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=182053 Fakulteta za varnostne vede 0 0 0