20.500.12556/DKUM-92328 Učinkovitost uporabe lifevac sukcijskega pripomočka in sesalnika pri odstranitvi tujka iz dihalne poti Effectiveness of using the lifevac anti-choking device and a vacuum cleaner for removal of foreign body airway obstruction Uvod: Zadušitve so nujni pojav, ki zahteva takojšnjo pomoč, ki v Evropi temelji na smernicah Evropskega združevanja za reanimacijo. V literaturi so zapisane številne alternative za odstranjevanje tujka iz dihalne poti, ena od njih sta LifeVac sukcijski pripomoček in sesalnik z nastavkom in obrazno masko. Metode: Izvedli smo eksperiment, v katerem so sodelovali študenti zdravstvene nege. Izvedli smo dva scenarija, ki sta potekala v simuliranem okolju. Žrtev v obliki simulacijske lutke je bila v enem prostoru, LifeVac sukcijski pripomoček in sesalnik z nastavkom in obrazno masko pa v drugem. Ocenjevali smo hitrost in število potrebnih sukcij z LifeVac sukcijskim pripomočkom in sesalnikom z nastavkom in obrazno masko posebej. Rezultati: Sodelovalo je 23 študentov zdravstvene nege. Pri odstranitvi tujka iz dihalne poti je bil LifeVac sukcijski pripomoček uspešen v 91 % (21/23), sesalnik z nastavkom in obrazno masko pa v 96 % (22/23). Povprečna hitrost odstranitve tujka iz dihalne poti pri uporabi LifeVac sukcijskega pripomočka je 20,8±8,2 sekunde, pri sesalniku z nastavkom in obrazno masko pa 38,4±8,7 sekunde. Povprečno je LifeVac sukcijski pripomoček za odpravo tujka potreboval dve sukciji, sesalnik z nastavkom in obrazno masko pa eno. Razprava in zaključek: Študenti zdravstvene nege so izrazili večje zadovoljstvo z uporabo LifeVac sukcijskega pripomočka. Menimo, da bi bilo smiselno obe alternativi vključiti v domače okolje, vendar so za to potrebne dodatne raziskave. Introduction: Choking is an emergency that requires immediate assistance, which in Europe is based on the quidelines of the European Resusctitation Council. We wrote about numerous alternatives for removing foreight body airway obstruction, one of which is the LifeVac suction device and a vacuum cleaner with attachment and face mask. Methods: We did an experiment in which nursing students participated. We ran two scenarios that took place in a simulated environment. The victim in the form of a simulation doll was in one room, and the LifeVac suction device and vacuum cleaner with attachment and face mask were in the other. We evaluated the speed and number of suctions required, with both alternatives in particular. Results: 23 nursing students participated. The LifeVac suction device was 91%(21/23) successful in removing the foreign body airway obstruction, while the vacuum cleaner with attachment and face mask was successful in 96% (22/23). The average rate of removal when using the LifeVac suction device was 20.8±8.2 seconds, and 38.4±8.7 seconds for a vacuum cleaner with attachment and face mask. On average, the LifeVac suction device required two suctions. The vacuum cleaner with attachment and a face mask required one. Discussion and conclusion: Nursing students expressed greater satisfaction with the use of LifeVac suction device. We believe it would make sense to incorporate both alternatives into home environment. We also want to do further researches. LifeVac sesalnik tujek dihalna pot sukcija Lifevac vacuum cleaner obstruction airway suction true true false [M. Kraševec] Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Diplomsko delo/naloga 2025-03-30 16:52:16 2025-05-22 11:08:19 2025-07-21 09:52:39 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 Maribor 0 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 616-001.8:615.47(043.2) 235426819 VS_Krasevec_Maj_2025.pdf VS_Krasevec_Maj_2025.pdf 1 B0BE88887F7761453240ECCC0C3E613F 0899101b942db28e888d792b91a3de98b341c9502c0dd60fa5f61c6949d58be1 fc59ea82-0d77-11f0-9a9d-00155d000105 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=189824 Fakulteta za zdravstvene vede 0 0 0