20.500.12556/DKUM-93716 Okoljska komunikacija političnih strank v obdobju parlamentarnih volitev v Sloveniji leta 2022 Environmental communication by political parties in the context of the 2022 Slovenian parliamentary elections Varstvo okolja je pomembna tema v mednarodnem političnem diskurzu že od poznih 80.-ih let prešnjega stoletja, vendar je v slovenski politiki postala bolj izpostavljena šele v prvem desetletju novega stoletja, ko je Slovenija leta 2004 postala del Evropske unije in se s tem zavezala varstvu okolja in podnebnim ukrepom. V začetku drugega desetletja 21. stoletja sta pandemija Covida 19 in vojna v Ukrajini bistveno spremenili politično agendo, saj sta vprašanje nacionalne varnosti postavili nad in pred boj proti okoljski krizi. V sklopu parlamentarnih volitev v Sloveniji leta 2022 je bila ta tendenca močno razvidna. Tematski sklop podnebnih sprememb, okoljske krize in okoljevarstva je bil sicer prisoten v predvolilnih kampanjah nekaterih strank, vendar ne vseh. Prav tako presenetljivo je, da je bil redko neposredno naslovljen v televizijskih in radijskih soočenjih strank. Prispevek na podlagi strankarskih programov in televizijskih soočenj analizira način, kako so stranke v času predvolilne kampanje komunicirale o okoljski krizi. Predvsem nas zanima, ali je bila ta komunikacija v skladu s smernicami in priporočili za ustrezno podnebno komuniciranje* (kot jih je na primer predlagala Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health: https://www.hsph.harvard .edu/chc/resources/climate-communication-tips/) ter kateri (metaforični) okviri in konceptualne metafore so prevladovali v tej komunikaciji. Environmental protection has been part of international political discourse since the late 1980s, but gained prominence in Slovenian politics only after the country joined the EU in 2004. This commitment to climate change mitigation was later challenged by shifting political priorities, particularly due to the Covid-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine, which brought national security to the forefront. These global crises influenced the 2022 Slovenian parliamentary elections, where environmental issues were unevenly represented across party campaigns. While some parties addressed climate change and environmental protection, others largely ignored them. Notably, these topics were seldom discussed in televised and radio debates. This paper examines how political parties and the media communicated the environmental crisis during the election campaign, drawing on party manifestos and televised debates. The analysis focuses on whether this communication aligned with established guidelines for effective climate communication (e.g., those from the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health) and explores the dominant metaphorical frames and conceptual metaphors used. podnebne spremembe podnebni diskurz metaforična konceptualizacija podnebna komunikacija uokvirjanje climate changes climate discourse climate communication framing metaphorical conceptualization true false true Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Znanstveno delo 2025-07-16 03:09:49 2025-08-26 12:31:09 2025-08-27 03:50:21 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 0 Str. 137-184 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 2025-07-04 81'27:551.583 240343043 242626819 RAZ_Fabcic_Melanija_2025.pdf RAZ_Fabcic_Melanija_2025.pdf 1 6DB9C1494A9E9DDF348CA10A5FAACF3C 22fc8ed438c0eeea204ed667eb31205cfbe1b04e03e56caed131e74dc26d62e5 df34f587-8267-11f0-99c7-00155d000105 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=196384 https://doi.org/10.18690/um.ff.6.2025.5 0 fc4fe9de-8267-11f0-99c7-00155d000105 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=196385 Filozofska fakulteta 0 0 0