20.500.12556/DKUM-94706 The puzzle of scientific disagreement Scientists often find themselves in disagreement with their peers, yet continue to hold fast to their views. While Conciliationism, a prominent position in the epistemology of disagreement, condemns such steadfastness as epistemically irrational, philosophers of science often defend it as rationally permissible–indeed, even beneficial for scientific progress. This tension gives rise to what we call the puzzle of scientific disagreement. scientific disagreement conciliationism steadfastness philosophy of science epistemology znanstveno nesoglasje spravljivost filozofija znanosti odločnost spoznavna teorija true false true Angleški jezik Slovenski jezik Znanstveno delo 2025-08-26 03:35:20 2025-10-22 14:56:16 2025-10-23 03:14:55 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 0 str. 1-21 št. članka 35 Letn. 15 2025 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 2025-05-06 2025-06-02 165.194 238533379 10.1007/s13194-025-00662-4 1879-4920 RAZ_Cocchiaro_Mariangela_Zoe_2025.pdf RAZ_Cocchiaro_Mariangela_Zoe_2025.pdf 1 95EF52B6AB0F5F98F17E7C46AA201992 176898e43b0fc6bae88d6c27e3e8c96f412ceee9a58435f4b7f9d9617668f44e b1d87eaa-af46-11f0-b74c-00155d000105 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=200125 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13194-025-00662-4 1 ed88359e-821c-11f0-99c7-00155d000105 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=196321 Filozofska fakulteta 0 0 0