20.500.12556/DKUM-95139 Kaj si pa ti kot politik naredil za ta uspeh?! raba strokovnega jezika diplomacije med poslankami in poslanci državnega zbora v letih od 1990 do 2018 How did you as a politician contribute to this success? the use of the language of diplomacy among members of the National Assembly between 1990 and 2018 Namen članka je ugotoviti, kako poslanke in poslanci državnega zbora uporabljajo strokovno izrazje s področja diplomacije. Na podlagi kvantitativne in kvalitativne analize smo ugotovili, da poslanke in poslanci državnega zbora: (1) v svojih govornih nastopih pogosto uporabljajo strokovne izraze s področja diplomacije neustrezno ali na poljuden način; (2) v svojih nastopih, kadar govorijo o področju diplomacije, pogosto ne uporabljajo jezika stroke, temveč bolj družbeno razširjen publicistični jezik; (3) uporabljajo v svojih govorih politični jezik, ki temelji na pogovorni, ne pa na knjižni pogovorni ali knjižni zborni socialni zvrsti jezika. The aim of this article is to establish how the members of the National Assembly use professional terminology in the field of diplomacy. At the same time, it wishes to determine the extent to which diplomatic terminology is established in the Slovenian language. The research was conducted using the siParl 2.0 text corpus, applying both quantitative and qualitative research methods. The results show that it is frequently the case that members of the National Assembly in their speeches use professional terms inadequately (or even incorrectly) or in a semi-colloquial manner. There are also many cases in which professional terms from the field of diplomacy are not used precisely or even sound flat. The analysis also confirms that members of the National Assembly often use simpler (political) language to relate more with their constituents, even when talking about complex issues. However, precisely by refraining from using “professional terminology” when speaking about these issues, they often cause not only a deviation from the terminology, but also confusion about what they really want to express and what message they wish to convey. As a result, the article concludes that a clearer distinction should be made in the debates in the National Assembly between popular (and simpler) political language when it comes to some general political-economic issues, and professional (or more complex) language when it comes to specific issues. This holds especially in the case of the professional language of diplomacy, which ipso facto by its very fabric carries a certain message that does not only have a societal impact, but also an ideological one. Državni zbor Republike Slovenije parlament poslanke in poslanci jezik diplomacije jezikovna kultura korpus siParl 2.0 professional language language culture professional language diplomacy specialised terminology National Assembly MPs corpus SIParl 20.0 true false true Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Slovenija; Znanstveno delo 2025-09-05 14:04:29 2025-09-05 14:04:30 2025-09-08 08:04:04 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 0 str. 115-138 št. 1 Letn. 18 2025 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 2025-06-24 81'33 240399107 10.18690/scn.18.1.%25p.2025 2385-8753 RAZ_Udovic_Bostjan_2025.pdf RAZ_Udovic_Bostjan_2025.pdf 1 DCB3E2ABBF3E5CC62C5BD01D21F294B7 752b3037b80ec41d90ec01c7bdb26064ff974b3cc462ba38f7d0ce5e6a69fee1 cd3ad1f1-8a50-11f0-b26f-00155d000105 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=197747 https://journals.um.si/index.php/slaviacentralis/article/view/5226 1 7a60e6e4-8a50-11f0-b26f-00155d000105 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=197746 Filozofska fakulteta Slavia Centralis 0 0 0