20.500.12556/DKUM-96147 Zakonska domneva odgovornosti lastnika vozila za prekrške v prometu Legal presumption of liability of the vehicle owner for traffic violations V prispevku bomo opozorili na odprto vprašanje sedanje ureditve in praktičnega izvajanja zakonske domneve iz 8. člena Zakona o pravilih cestnega prometa (»Zakon o pravilih cestnega prometa (ZPrCP)«, 2010), ki rigidno temelji na ustavnem privilegiju zoper samoobtožbo. Zakonodajalec je z določitvijo domneve odgovornosti lastnika oziroma imetnika pravice uporabe vozila skušal doseči, da bi bili storilci prekrškov v cestnem prometu tudi dejansko kaznovani. Namreč, kaznovalna politika je eden od delov veljavne ureditve prometnega sistema, ki je ob upoštevanju obstoječega stanja v cestnem prometu ni mogoče enako učinkovito nadomestiti z drugimi ukrepi. Primerjalnopravne rešitve iz Nemčije, Hrvaške, Nizozemske in Avstrije kažejo, da je mogoče uvesti tudi učinkovitejše modele, ki spoštujejo sicer demokratični in ustavni privilegij zoper samoobtožbo, pa kljub temu dosegajo namen zakona v primerih, ko je bil prekršek zoper varnost cestnega prometa storjen z vozilom, pa ni mogoče ugotoviti, kdo je storilec. In this article, we will draw attention to the open issue of the current regulation and practical implementation of the legal presumption from Article 8 of the Road Traffic Rules Act ("Zakon o pravilih cestnega prometa (ZPrCP)", 2010), which is rigidly based on the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination. By establishing the presumption of responsibility of the owner or holder of the right to use a vehicle, the legislator tried to ensure that perpetrators of road traffic offences would actually be punished. Namely, the penal policy is one of the parts of the current regulation of the traffic system, which, taking into account the existing situation in road traffic, cannot be replaced equally effectively by other measures. Comparative legal solutions from Germany, Croatia, the Netherlands and Austria show that it is possible to introduce more effective models that respect the democratic and constitutional privilege against self-incrimination, and achieve the purpose of the law in cases where a road traffic offence was committed with a vehicle, but it is not possible to determine who the perpetrator is. prekrškovno pravo zakonska domneva nedolžnosti obrnjeno dokazno breme privilegij pred samoobtožbo pravila cestnega prometa true true false Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Neznano 2025-12-04 10:08:06 2025-12-04 10:08:06 2025-12-06 03:08:25 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 0 Str. 53-60 0000-00-00 NiDoloceno NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 343:656.051 254602243 259469571 10.18690/um.fvv.4.2025.5 https://press.um.si/index.php/ump/catalog/book/1066/chapter/878 1 bf317169-d0f0-11f0-b6ea-00155d000105 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=201122 Fakulteta za varnostne vede 0 0 0