20.500.12556/DKUM-96259 Izbrani vidiki uporabe umetne inteligence v sodnih postopkih Selected aspects regarding the use of artificial inteligence in court proceedings Poglavje obravnava možnosti uporabe sistemov umetne inteligence v sodnih postopkih. Uporaba sistemov umetne inteligence prinaša prednosti, predvsem glede na načelo ekonomičnosti postopkov. Po drugi strani uporabo takšnih sistemov spremljajo pomanjkljivosti in slabosti, ki se odražajo predvsem kot ovire pri doslednem zagotavljanju načela enakega varstva pravic in pravice do sodnega varstva. Avtorja obravnavata omenjene slabosti in pomanjkljivosti, pri čemer se ne omejujeta zgolj na obstoječe sisteme umetne inteligence v sodnih postopkih, ampak poskušata oblikovati splošne zaključke, ki temeljijo na omejitvah, ki izhajajo iz same zasnove tehnologije velikih jezikovnih modelov. Pravna analiza problema upošteva nacionalni in mednarodni (pravo EU in EKČP) pravni okvir relevantnih načel. Poglavje vključuje razpravo o obstoju pravice do človeškega sodnika, ki na načelni ravni izključuje uporabo sistemov umetne inteligence v svojstvu odločevalca. This chapter examines the possibilities of using artificial intelligence systems in judicial proceedings. The use of artificial intelligence systems brings with it advantages, especially in terms of the principle of the efficiency of proceedings. On the other hand, the use of such systems is accompanied by disadvantages and shortcomings, which are mainly reflected as obstacles to the guarantees stemming from the principle of equal protection of rights and the right to judicial protection. The authors address these disadvantages and shortcomings, not limiting themselves to existing artificial intelligence systems in judicial proceedings, but attempting to draw general conclusions based on the limitations inherent in the very design of large language model technology. The legal analysis of the problem takes into account the national and international (EU law and ECHR) legal framework of the relevant principles. The chapter includes a discussion on the existence of a right to a human judge, which excludes, at a principle level, the use of AI systems in the capacity of a decisionmaker. umetna inteligenca klepetalni robot pravica do enakega varstva pravic načelo kontradiktornosti logično-izkustvena presoja pravica do človeškega sodnika artificial intelligence chatbot right to equal protection of rights the adversarial proceedings principle logical-empirical reasoning right to a human judge true false false Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Neznano 2025-12-13 03:08:08 2025-12-22 12:05:37 2025-12-23 03:21:39 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 0 Str. 165-198 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova NiDoloceno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 347.9:004.8 259176707 261242627 10.18690/um.pf.11.2025.7 https://press.um.si/index.php/ump/catalog/book/1071/chapter/920 1 91d6e477-d7c8-11f0-9572-00155d580e02 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=201406 Izbrani+vidiki+uporabe+umetne+inteligence+v+sodnih+postopkih+_(1).pdf Izbrani+vidiki+uporabe+umetne+inteligence+v+sodnih+postopkih+_(1).pdf 1 BEC8597B887D17C9785BF94A5197A5DD ca3aa2eac997e1a05cec43d732f203002856586d6f3a3b2bd7b0e0a0eef22bf0 10838a54-df26-11f0-8504-00155d580e02 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=201618 Pravna fakulteta 0 0 0