20.500.12556/DKUM-96488 Prednosti in slabosti dvotirnega zapisovanja govora v slovenskih govornih virih Advantages and disadvantages of two-tier speech transcription in slovenian speech resources Zapisovanje govora v govornih korpusih je nedvomno časovno največji vložek v procesu izdelave govornega korpusa in pomemben razlog, da so govorni korpusi neprimerno manjši od pisnih. Zapis govora je prevod iz izvorno večmodalnega kanala komunikacije, v katerem verbalno izraženi pomen sooblikujejo glas in način govora, govorica telesa in situacija, v kateri poteka komunikacija, v eno, pisno modalnost. Zaradi variabilnosti govora na vseh jezikovnih ravneh se zapisovalec pri tem nenehno sooča z vprašanjem, kako naj to, kar sliši, zapiše. Da bi bil zapis čim bolj verodostojen, hkrati pa časovno vseeno izvedljiv za velik obseg gradiv, se je tako poleg standardiziranega zapisa vzpostavil tudi tako imenovani pogovorni zapis, ki sledi načelu zapiši, kakor je izgovorjeno. Toda dvojni zapis zahteva dodaten trud, zato v tem prispevku kritično prevprašujemo njegovo utemeljenost glede na prakse drugod, zahtevan dodaten trud in njegove prednosti ter kritično analiziramo še druga težavnejša vprašanja zapisovanja. Transcribing speech in speech corpora is undoubtedly the largest time investment in the process of creating a speech corpus and an important reason that speech corpora are considerably smaller than written ones. Speech transcription is a translation from an originally multimodal channel of communication, in which verbally expressed meaning is shaped by the voice and manner of speaking, body language, etc., and converted into a single, written modality. Due to the variability of speech at all linguistic levels, the transcriber constantly faces the question of how to transcribe what s/he hears. In order to make the transcription as exact as possible, but at the same time feasible when working with large amounts of data, a pronunciation-based transcription was introduced in Slovenian speech corpora along with the standardized transcription. However, two-tier transcription requires additional effort. For this reason, this paper critically assesses its rationale, comparing practices used elsewhere, estimates of the additional effort and its advantages. Additionally, we assess other challenging aspects of speech transcription. transkribiranje standardizirani zapisi ortografska transkripcija pogovorni zapisi fonetična transkripcija transcribing standardized transcription orthographic transcription literal transcription phonetic transcription true false true Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik https://press.um.si/index.php/ump Znanstveno delo 2026-01-14 08:32:33 2026-01-14 08:32:33 2026-01-15 03:10:11 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2024 0 0 Str. 63-79 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 2024-07-18 808 201876739 202752259 10.18690/um.ff.4.2024.4 Prednosti+in+slabosti+dvotirnega+zapisovanja+govora+v+slovenskih+govornih+virih.pdf Prednosti+in+slabosti+dvotirnega+zapisovanja+govora+v+slovenskih+govornih+virih.pdf 1 E5518564D4DE4B7767DE1EB249BCAACD f185a426c442dd07622a203dd71060beb7a3d1f0dea27d40941e793e582715ae ced5f88e-f11b-11f0-8a93-00155d580e02 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=201988 https://press.um.si/index.php/ump/catalog/book/898/chapter/48 1 317b55e7-f11b-11f0-8a93-00155d580e02 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=201986 Fakulteta za elektrotehniko, računalništvo in informatiko 0 0 0