20.500.12556/DKUM-97134 Med pravili in svobodo Rawls in Illich o vlogi institucij v družbi Between Rules and Freedom Rawls and Illich on the Role of Institutions in Society Prispevek primerja Illichovo in Rawlsovo razumevanje vloge institucij pri oblikovanju pravične družbene ureditve in zagotavljanju posameznikove avtonomije. Rawls družbene institucije obravnava kot ključni temelj pravične in stabilne družbene strukture, medtem ko Illich opozarja na njihove omejitve, zlasti v zvezi z legitimnostjo ter politično, ideološko in gospodarsko nevtralnostjo. Po Illichovem mnenju institucije lahko ogrožajo posameznikovo svobodo, ko se iz sredstev za dosego ciljev spremenijo v cilje same po sebi. Kot alternativo predlaga družbo sožitja, ki zavrača tista orodja, torej tiste sisteme, tehnologije in institucije, ki bi se lahko izrodile v nadzor ali omejevanje svobode. Vendar pa tudi ta rešitev ni brez tveganj, saj lahko zapade v enake težave kot institucije, tako da prevzame določene oblike nadzora in omejevanja, značilne za tradicionalne skupnosti. Kljub tem omejitvam Illichova kritika opozarja na potrebo po reformi institucij, da bi te dejansko služile zaščiti posameznikove svobode in avtonomije. The article compares Illich’s and Rawls’s understanding of the role of institutions in shaping a just social order and ensuring individual autonomy. Rawls regards social institutions as the essential foundation of a just and stable societal structure, while Illich highlights their limitations, particularly concerning legitimacy and political, ideological, and economic neutrality. According to Illich, institutions can threaten individual freedom when they shift from being the means for achieving goals to becoming ends in themselves. As an alternative, he proposes a convivial community that rejects tools – namely systems, technologies, and institutions – that could degenerate into mechanisms of control or restrictions on freedom. However, even this solution is not without risks, as it may fall into the same problems as institutions by adopting certain forms of control and restriction characteristic of traditional communities. Despite these limitations, Illich’s critique underscores the need for institutional reform to ensure that they truly serve the protection of individual freedom and autonomy. Illich Rawls družbene institucije svoboda pravičnost posameznikova avtoriteta Illich Rawls social institutions liberty justice individual autonomy true false true Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Znanstveno delo 2026-02-19 12:28:19 2026-02-19 12:28:19 2026-05-15 08:56:29 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2024 0 Maribor 0 14 št. 2 Letn. 28 2024 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 2024-12-31 10.18690/analiza.28.2.153-166.2024 2712-491 RAZ_Vrdoljak_Jana_2025.pdf RAZ_Vrdoljak_Jana_2025.pdf 1 546A1336224C3C92BFC3CC5123274372 facb7ffef20f1622340fed9bb9b05ebe1e0f6277b53c642b64e6ce230574c796 c71febd3-0d87-11f1-a5b8-00155d580e1a https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=203528 https://journals.um.si/index.php/analiza/article/view/4936 0 a965beaa-0d87-11f1-a5b8-00155d580e1a https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=203527 Filozofska fakulteta Univerzitetna založba Univerze v Mariboru Analiza 0 0 0