20.500.12556/DKUM-97187 Kant in Schiller moralni zakon, nagnjenja in vrlina - I. del Kant and Schiller Moral Law, Inclinations, and Virtue - Part I. Schiller je – v nasprotju s Kantom – v Kailasu lepoto premestil oziroma umestil na področje praktičnega uma. To pomeni, da načelo lepote ni konstitutivno, temveč regulativno, kar z drugimi besedami pomeni, da bi moral vsakdo ugledati lepoto v objektu. Lepota ni po Schillerju nič drugega kot svoboda v pojavu. Težava je, kako določiti, kdaj je nekaj v izkustvu pojav svobode. Schiller je prepričan, da pripisujemo svobodo tistim objektom, ki so samodoločujoči, tistim, ki delujejo zgolj iz samih sebe. Njegovo »objektivno« načelo pomeni »subjektivno univerzalnost«, v tem smislu Schiller ni prišel nič dlje od Kanta, ki tudi zagovarja »subjektivno univerzalnost«. Članek primerja gledišča Schillerja na eni strani in Kanta na drugi strani in zaključi, da je bil Schiller z vidika analiziranega v članku korak pred Kantom, in da je Kant potreboval nekaj let, da je prišel do skoraj istovetnega stališča. Schiller – in contrast to Kant – relocated or situated beauty in the realm of practical reason in Kallias. This means that the principle of beauty is not constitutive but rather regulative, which, in other words, implies that everyone should perceive beauty in the object. According to Schiller, beauty is nothing but freedom in appearance. The question is which appearances deserve to be interpreted in this way? Schiller is convinced that we attribute freedom to those objects that are self-determining, those that act solely from themselves. His »objective« principle should be interpreted only in terms of »subjective universality«. In this sense, Schiller does not advance beyond Kant, who also supports »subjective universality«. The article compares the viewpoint of Schiller on one side and Kant on the other and concludes that, based on the analyzed topic, here Schiller was a step ahead of Kant, and it took Kant a few years to arrive at an almost identical position. Schiller Kant lepota moralni zakon vrlina Schiller Kant beauty moral law virtue true false false Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Znanstveno delo 2026-02-23 11:53:05 2026-02-23 11:53:05 2026-05-13 14:50:56 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2023 0 Maribor 0 28 št. 1 Letn. 27 2023 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 2023-12-22 1Kant I.: Schiller F.:17:111.852 191793155 10.18690/analiza.27.1.3-30.2023 2712-4916 RAZ_Kante_Bozidar_2023.pdf RAZ_Kante_Bozidar_2023.pdf 1 607446EE10541A9C5B18A1B2A3DD8C94 c35d5e75e380bf43f08774c9bd030cc2db442c0eca2633dda0da53e0038141d1 79b3e1a3-10a6-11f1-95c9-00155d580e1a https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=203658 https://journals.um.si/index.php/analiza/article/view/3820 0 d5da15f1-10a5-11f1-95c9-00155d580e1a https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=203657 Univerzitetna založba Univerze v Mariboru Filozofska fakulteta Analiza 0 0 0