20.500.12556/DKUM-97201 Problem ne-identitete kot problem okoljske etike? The Non-identity Problem as a Problem of Environmental Ethics? V okoljski etiki se kot teoretična prepreka ukrepom za preprečevanje podnebnih sprememb pogosto omenja tako imenovani problem ne-identitete (PNI). Ta temelji na konfliktu med intuicijo, da imajo nekatera naša dejanja, ki vplivajo na prihodnjike, moralno vrednost, in ugotovitvijo, da zaradi njihove narave vplivanja na identiteto težko pokažemo na ljudi, ki jim škodujejo. V članku poskušam pokazati, da PNI ne predstavlja takšnih težav. PNI najprej natančno predstavim. Nato analiziram dva pristopa, ki pokažeta, da ne moremo samoumevno sprejeti premise, da dejanja, kot je sprejetje ene energetske politike namesto druge, vplivajo na identiteto prihodnjikov. Prvi predstavljen pristop pod vprašaj postavi pojmovanje identitete, ki ga ta premisa predpostavlja, drugi pa pojmovanje vplivanja na identiteto. Izpostavim tudi nekaj možnih kritik obeh pristopov in odgovorim na njih. V zaključku razmišljam še o praktičnih implikacijah PNI za okoljevarstvene ukrepe in sklenem, da so odločitve, ki zadevajo prihodnjike, iz praktičnega vidika analogne odločitvam, ki zadevajo sodobnike. In environmental ethics, the non-identity problem (NIP) is often considered to be a theoretical obstacle to climate change mitigation. It is based on the conflict between the intuition that some of our actions that affect future generations have moral value and the conclusion that because of their nature of influencing identity, it is difficult to point to the people who are harmed by them. In this article, I try to show that NIP does not pose such problems. First, I present the NIP in detail. Then, I analyse two approaches that question the premise that actions such as adopting one energy policy instead of another affect the identity of future generations. The first approach calls into question the notion of identity that this premise presupposes, while the second questions the notion of influencing identity. I also highlight some possible criticisms of both approaches and respond to them. In conclusion, I consider the practical implications of NIP for environmental measures and conclude that decisions concerning future generations are, from a practical point of view, analogous to decisions concerning contemporaries. problem ne-identitete okoljska etika medgeneracijska pravičnost podnebne spremembe non-identity problem environmental ethics intergenerational justice climate change true false true Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Znanstveno delo 2026-02-23 13:28:03 2026-02-23 13:28:03 2026-05-13 15:02:23 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2023 0 Maribor 0 20 št. 1 Letn. 27 2023 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 0000-00-00 2023-12-22 17.021.3:502.12 191660547 10.18690/analiza.27.1.105-124.2023 2712-4916 https://journals.um.si/index.php/analiza/article/view/3825 0 191dad73-10b3-11f1-95c9-00155d580e1a https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=203680 RAZ_Justin_Martin_2023.pdf RAZ_Justin_Martin_2023.pdf 1 217E0760B781285DC0CF67D9F3492AC7 1182b0629f74c4965778c79a4fac2d7dc36cd3f22bc72b982e988d40a7859082 7af65a58-10b3-11f1-95c9-00155d580e1a https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=203681 Univerzitetna založba Univerze v Mariboru Filozofska fakulteta Analiza 0 0 0