20.500.12556/DKUM-97673 Kleveta svobode, diskriminacija dostojanstva Defamation of freedom, discrimination of dignity V sodobnem liberalizmu zahodnega sveta se svoboda izražanja pogosto povzdiguje v temeljno vrednoto, ki naj bi varovala pluralnost mnenj ter avtonomijo vsakega posameznika. Vendar pa se v kontekstu pornografije ta ideal zaplete v lastno protislovno mrežo, kjer svobodi izražanja preti, da postane sredstvo utrjevanja neenakosti. Pričujoči članek problematizira predvsem liberalno razumevanje takšne svobode, ki v imenu tolerance pogosto spregleda razmerja moči, ki ta diskurz pogojuje. V prvem delu prispevka predstavimo razumevanje svobode R. Dworkina, kot neprisiljene izbire, in feministično kritiko C. A. MacKinnon, ki opozarja, da pornografija ni le svoboda izražanja, temveč diskurz, v katerem se svoboda izražanja prelevi v svobodo zatiranja. V drugem delu zagovarjamo stališče, da liberalna toleranca do vsebin, ki degradirajo (predvsem ženska) telesa, razkriva paradoks tolerance, ki v strahu pred cenzuro izgubi samo sebe. V zaključku zato poudarimo, da svoboda brez etične odgovornosti ne osvobaja, temveč diskriminira. In contemporary Western liberalism, freedom of expression is often elevated to a fundamental value that is supposed to protect the plurality of opinions and the autonomy of each individual. However, in the context of pornography, this ideal becomes entangled in its own contradictory web, where freedom of expression threatens to become a means of reinforcing inequality. This article problematizes the liberal understanding of such freedom, which, in the name of tolerance, often overlooks the power relations that condition this discourse. In the first part of the article, we present R. Dworkin's understanding of freedom as uncoerced choice and C. A. MacKinnon's feminist critique, which argues that pornography is not only freedom of expression but also a discourse in which freedom of expression turns into freedom of oppression. In the second part, we argue that liberal tolerance of content that degrades (especially female) bodies reveals the paradox of tolerance, which loses itself in fear of censorship. In conclusion, we emphasize that freedom without ethical responsibility does not liberate, but discriminates. liberalizem pornografija feministična filozofija kapitalizem liberalism pornography feminist philosophy capitalism true false true Univerza v Mariboru, Univerzitetna založba Slovenski jezik Angleški jezik Znanstveno delo 2026-04-01 03:10:28 2026-04-03 11:34:46 2026-04-04 03:12:31 0000-00-00 00:00:00 2025 0 Maribor 0 str. 113-127 št. 1 Letn. 29 2025 0000-00-00 Zaloznikova Objavljeno NiDoloceno 0000-00-00 2025-08-31 2025-12-17 123 272964611 10.18690/analiza.29.1.113-128.2025 1408-2969 RAZ_Jersic_Alja_2025.pdf RAZ_Jersic_Alja_2025.pdf 1 8C641673B14675D31D816A444215E8E4 de16c6002d80bb7450b1ee8ce1e2e004d71e84fe99ede776c526e982b076884b 4e841e90-2f40-11f1-9f9f-00155d0001a1 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=205025 https://journals.um.si/index.php/analiza/en/article/view/5854/3537 1 9330756c-2d67-11f1-b2eb-00155d0001a1 https://dk.um.si/Dokument.php?lang=slv&id=204949 Filozofska fakulteta Univerzitetna založba Univerze v Mariboru Analiza 0 0 0